Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal Co.

GPTKB entity

Predicate	Object
gptkbp:instanceOf	gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
gptkbp:citation	556 U.S. 868
gptkbp:concurringOpinionBy	gptkb:Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg gptkb:John_Paul_Stevens gptkb:Stephen_Breyer
gptkbp:date	June 8, 2009
gptkbp:decidedBy	gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
gptkbp:defendant	gptkb:A.T._Massey_Coal_Co.
gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy	gptkb:John_Roberts gptkb:Antonin_Scalia gptkb:Clarence_Thomas gptkb:Samuel_Alito
gptkbp:docketNumber	08-22
gptkbp:heldBy	Due process requires recusal of a judge when a party's significant campaign contributions create a probability of bias.
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal Co.
gptkbp:legalSubject	due process judicial recusal
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy	gptkb:Anthony_Kennedy
gptkbp:originatedIn	gptkb:West_Virginia
gptkbp:plaintiff	gptkb:Hugh_Caperton
gptkbp:predecessor	judicial recusal standards in the United States
gptkbp:relatedTo	campaign finance judicial ethics
gptkbp:bfsParent	gptkb:Roberts_Court
gptkbp:bfsLayer	6