Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc.
GPTKB entity
Statements (23)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
|
| gptkbp:associatedWith |
gptkb:William_Dees
gptkb:Roy_Orbison gptkb:2_Live_Crew |
| gptkbp:citation |
gptkb:510_U.S._569
|
| gptkbp:date |
March 7, 1994
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court
|
| gptkbp:docketNumber |
92-1292
|
| gptkbp:heldBy |
A commercial parody can qualify as fair use under copyright law.
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc.
|
| gptkbp:judge |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
| gptkbp:opinionBy |
gptkb:David_Souter
|
| gptkbp:petitioner |
gptkb:Luther_Campbell
|
| gptkbp:principle |
Parody may be fair use even if it is for profit.
Fair use analysis is not precluded by commercial nature of the work. |
| gptkbp:relatedWork |
gptkb:Oh,_Pretty_Woman
|
| gptkbp:response |
gptkb:Acuff-Rose_Music,_Inc.
|
| gptkbp:subject |
gptkb:intellectual_property
satire fair use |
| gptkbp:unanimousDecision |
true
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Toward_a_Fair_Use_Standard_(1990)
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
6
|