Cameron v. EMW Women's Surgical Center, P.S.C.

GPTKB entity

Statements (49)
Predicate Object
gptkbp:instanceOf legal case
gptkbp:caseTypes 21-1234
gptkbp:community_engagement controversial among activists
gptkbp:court 5-4 decision
multiple law firms
gptkbp:decidedBy gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
gptkbp:future_plans affects reproductive justice movements
affects women's health policy
influences judicial appointments
shapes legal landscape for abortion
sparks legal challenges
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label Cameron v. EMW Women's Surgical Center, P.S.C.
gptkbp:impact influences state-level abortion laws
gptkbp:influence influences elections
gptkbp:involves abortion rights
gptkbp:is_involved_in gptkb:David_Cameron
gptkb:EMW_Women's_Surgical_Center
gptkbp:judges gptkb:Justice_Sotomayor
gptkb:Justice_Kagan
Justice Breyer
considered women's rights
evaluated public health concerns
examined state interests
gptkbp:legal_principle constitutionality of abortion restrictions
gptkbp:legal_representation gptkb:Kentucky_Attorney_General
impact assessment
constitutional interpretation
precedent analysis
statutory interpretation
gptkbp:legalStatus held in 2022
post-Roe_v._Wade_era
gptkbp:legislation new abortion laws proposed
gptkbp:media_coverage widely reported
gptkbp:notableFeature sets precedent for future cases
2022 WL 1234567
affects access to abortion services
gptkbp:outcome upheld state law
gptkbp:politicalParty gptkb:Justice_Alito
gptkb:Justice_Thomas
gptkb:Justice_Kavanaugh
gptkb:Justice_Gorsuch
gptkbp:precedent affects future abortion legislation
gptkbp:public_perception divided among voters
gptkbp:regulatoryCompliance debated implications
gptkbp:relatedPatent gptkb:Planned_Parenthood_v._Casey
gptkb:Whole_Woman's_Health_v._Hellerstedt
gptkbp:significance impact on reproductive rights
gptkbp:submissionDeadline amicus curiae briefs
gptkbp:year 2022