Cameron v. EMW Women's Surgical Center, P.S.C.
GPTKB entity
Statements (49)
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
gptkbp:caseTypes |
21-1234
|
gptkbp:community_engagement |
controversial among activists
|
gptkbp:court |
5-4 decision
multiple law firms |
gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
gptkbp:future_plans |
affects reproductive justice movements
affects women's health policy influences judicial appointments shapes legal landscape for abortion sparks legal challenges |
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Cameron v. EMW Women's Surgical Center, P.S.C.
|
gptkbp:impact |
influences state-level abortion laws
|
gptkbp:influence |
influences elections
|
gptkbp:involves |
abortion rights
|
gptkbp:is_involved_in |
gptkb:David_Cameron
gptkb:EMW_Women's_Surgical_Center |
gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Justice_Sotomayor
gptkb:Justice_Kagan Justice Breyer considered women's rights evaluated public health concerns examined state interests |
gptkbp:legal_principle |
constitutionality of abortion restrictions
|
gptkbp:legal_representation |
gptkb:Kentucky_Attorney_General
impact assessment constitutional interpretation precedent analysis statutory interpretation |
gptkbp:legalStatus |
held in 2022
post-Roe_v._Wade_era |
gptkbp:legislation |
new abortion laws proposed
|
gptkbp:media_coverage |
widely reported
|
gptkbp:notableFeature |
sets precedent for future cases
2022 WL 1234567 affects access to abortion services |
gptkbp:outcome |
upheld state law
|
gptkbp:politicalParty |
gptkb:Justice_Alito
gptkb:Justice_Thomas gptkb:Justice_Kavanaugh gptkb:Justice_Gorsuch |
gptkbp:precedent |
affects future abortion legislation
|
gptkbp:public_perception |
divided among voters
|
gptkbp:regulatoryCompliance |
debated implications
|
gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:Planned_Parenthood_v._Casey
gptkb:Whole_Woman's_Health_v._Hellerstedt |
gptkbp:significance |
impact on reproductive rights
|
gptkbp:submissionDeadline |
amicus curiae briefs
|
gptkbp:year |
2022
|