California v. Cabazon Band of Mission Indians

GPTKB entity

Predicate	Object
gptkbp:instanceOf	gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
gptkbp:citation	480 U.S. 202
gptkbp:date	1987-02-25
gptkbp:decidedBy	gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy	gptkb:Antonin_Scalia gptkb:William_H._Rehnquist
gptkbp:docketNumber	85-1708
gptkbp:heldBy	States do not have authority to regulate gaming on Indian reservations if such gaming is not prohibited by state law and is regulated by the tribe.
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	California v. Cabazon Band of Mission Indians
gptkbp:impact	Led to the passage of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act in 1988
gptkbp:legalSubject	Tribal sovereignty Indian gaming
gptkbp:location	gptkb:California
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy	gptkb:Byron_White gptkb:Sandra_Day_O'Connor gptkb:Thurgood_Marshall gptkb:William_J._Brennan_Jr. gptkb:Lewis_F._Powell_Jr. gptkb:John_Paul_Stevens gptkb:Harry_Blackmun
gptkbp:petitioner	gptkb:State_of_California
gptkbp:predecessor	gptkb:Indian_Gaming_Regulatory_Act
gptkbp:relatedLegislation	gptkb:Indian_Gaming_Regulatory_Act
gptkbp:response	gptkb:Cabazon_Band_of_Mission_Indians gptkb:Morongo_Band_of_Mission_Indians
gptkbp:subject	State regulation of tribal gaming
gptkbp:bfsParent	gptkb:481_U.S._1_(1987)
gptkbp:bfsLayer	7