Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee
GPTKB entity
Statements (90)
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:court_cases
|
gptkbp:case_outcome |
5-4 ruling
upheld state law Increased scrutiny of voting laws Strengthened state authority Impact on minority voters Implications for future elections Legal challenges expected Potential for further litigation Long-term effects on voting rights Responses from political leaders influences state legislation on voting rejected DNC claims significant for election integrity debates Debate over voter suppression Influence on federal election laws Reactions from civil rights groups Significant for Republican states |
gptkbp:case_types |
civil rights case
Civil rights case election law case |
gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Washington,_D._C.
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States gptkb:Ninth_Circuit_Court_of_Appeals |
gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court
July 1, 2021 |
gptkbp:dissenting_opinion |
gptkb:Justice_Elena_Kagan
gptkb:Justice_Sonia_Sotomayor gptkb:Justice_Stephen_Breyer |
gptkbp:docket_number |
19-1250
|
gptkbp:effective_date |
July 1, 2021
|
gptkbp:has_implications_for |
federal oversight of voting rights
state authority over elections |
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee
|
gptkbp:impact |
national voting policies
Arizona voters State voting regulations |
gptkbp:involved_parties |
gptkb:Democratic_National_Committee
gptkb:Mark_Brnovich |
gptkbp:involves |
gptkb:voter_suppression_claims
Arizona voting laws |
gptkbp:is_cited_in |
594 U. S. ___ (2021)
|
gptkbp:issues |
Voter ID requirements
Ballot collection laws |
gptkbp:judged_by |
Affirmed lower court ruling
|
gptkbp:judicial_review |
Supreme Court review
|
gptkbp:legal_context |
Election law
federal election laws state election laws |
gptkbp:legal_issue |
gptkb:Voting_rights
discriminatory effect of voting laws |
gptkbp:legal_representation |
gptkb:Democratic_National_Committee
gptkb:Arizona_Attorney_General Democratic National Committee lawyers |
gptkbp:legislation |
Arizona Senate Bill 1485
Arizona House Bill 2023 |
gptkbp:media_coverage |
extensive coverage
Extensive coverage analysis of implications |
gptkbp:outcome |
State election laws
Upheld Arizona voting laws upheld Arizona voting restrictions |
gptkbp:party |
gptkb:Democratic_National_Committee
gptkb:Mark_Brnovich |
gptkbp:precedent |
gptkb:Voting_Rights_Act_of_1965
Future voting rights cases voting rights litigation affects future voting rights cases |
gptkbp:public_perception |
gptkb:Justice_Amy_Coney_Barrett
gptkb:Justice_Brett_Kavanaugh gptkb:Justice_Samuel_Alito |
gptkbp:public_reaction |
controversial ruling
Controversial ruling criticism from civil rights groups support from conservative groups |
gptkbp:related_cases |
gptkb:Anderson_v._Celebrezze
gptkb:Shelby_County_v._Holder |
gptkbp:related_to |
gptkb:Voting_Rights_Act_of_1965
gptkb:Shelby_County_v._Holder |
gptkbp:scholarly_analysis |
impact on future elections
Analyzed in legal journals state versus federal authority legal interpretations of voting rights |
gptkbp:significance |
impact on voting rights
Influence on future voting legislation Voting access debate |
gptkbp:state |
gptkb:Arizona
|
gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court |
gptkbp:bfsLayer |
3
|