|
gptkbp:instanceOf
|
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
|
|
gptkbp:alsoKnownAs
|
The Christian Burial Speech case
|
|
gptkbp:arguedDate
|
1976-12-14
|
|
gptkbp:citation
|
430 U.S. 387
|
|
gptkbp:date
|
1977-06-20
|
|
gptkbp:decidedBy
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
|
gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy
|
gptkb:William_Rehnquist
|
|
gptkbp:docketNumber
|
74-1263
|
|
gptkbp:fullName
|
Brewer v. Williams, 430 U.S. 387 (1977)
|
|
gptkbp:heldBy
|
Statements obtained in violation of the defendant's right to counsel are inadmissible.
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
Brewer v. Williams
|
|
gptkbp:joinedBy
|
gptkb:Byron_White
gptkb:Thurgood_Marshall
gptkb:William_J._Brennan_Jr.
gptkb:John_Paul_Stevens
gptkb:Warren_E._Burger
gptkb:Lewis_Powell
gptkb:Harry_Blackmun
|
|
gptkbp:legalIssue
|
gptkb:Sixth_Amendment_right_to_counsel
|
|
gptkbp:location
|
gptkb:Iowa
|
|
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Potter_Stewart
|
|
gptkbp:petitioner
|
gptkb:Robert_Williams
|
|
gptkbp:plotSummary
|
The case addressed whether police violated the defendant's Sixth Amendment right to counsel by eliciting incriminating statements after legal proceedings had begun.
|
|
gptkbp:predecessor
|
Nix v. Williams
|
|
gptkbp:relatedTo
|
Nix v. Williams
|
|
gptkbp:response
|
gptkb:State_of_Iowa
|
|
gptkbp:subject
|
gptkb:Criminal_procedure
Right to counsel
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:Sixth_Amendment_right_to_counsel
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
8
|