Statements (48)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:legal_case
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
5
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:In_re_Bilski
|
| gptkbp:area |
patent law
|
| gptkbp:consequences |
influenced patent law interpretation
|
| gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court
June 28, 2010 |
| gptkbp:docket_number |
07-1130
|
| gptkbp:historical_debate |
November 9, 2009
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Bilski case
|
| gptkbp:impact |
software patents
financial services patents |
| gptkbp:influenced |
patent portfolio management
intellectual property policy venture capital funding subsequent Supreme Court decisions investment in technology startups patent litigation strategies innovation in business methods patent application strategies |
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
court opinions
patent attorneys numerous legal scholars business method patent advocates intellectual property law textbooks |
| gptkbp:is_discussed_in |
legal seminars
court filings law review articles intellectual property blogs patent law conferences |
| gptkbp:is_involved_in |
gptkb:Bernard_Bilski
gptkb:Randall_J._Harris |
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
abstract ideas
machine-or-transformation test |
| gptkbp:notable_event |
gptkb:Mayo_Collaborative_Services_v._Prometheus_Laboratories
gptkb:Alice_Corp._v._CLS_Bank_International gptkb:In_re_Bilski |
| gptkbp:outcome |
5-4 ruling
patent application rejected reaffirmed limits on patentable subject matter |
| gptkbp:precedent |
subsequent patent cases
|
| gptkbp:public_perception |
gptkb:Justice_John_Paul_Stevens
gptkb:Justice_Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg gptkb:Justice_Anthony_Kennedy gptkb:Justice_Stephen_Breyer |
| gptkbp:related_to |
business method patents
|
| gptkbp:significance |
clarified patent eligibility standards
|
| gptkbp:year |
gptkb:2008
|