|
gptkbp:instance_of
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
|
gptkbp:argued_on
|
November 19, 1974
|
|
gptkbp:case_outcome
|
Unconstitutional restriction on advertising
|
|
gptkbp:decided_by
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
June 30, 1975
|
|
gptkbp:dissenting_opinion
|
gptkb:Justice_William_Rehnquist
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
Bigelow v. Virginia
|
|
gptkbp:impact
|
Advertising regulations
|
|
gptkbp:involved_parties
|
Bigelow and the Commonwealth of Virginia
|
|
gptkbp:is_cited_in
|
421 U. S. 809
|
|
gptkbp:legal_context
|
Advertising and free speech
|
|
gptkbp:legal_issue
|
First Amendment rights
|
|
gptkbp:legal_principle
|
Commercial speech is protected under the First Amendment.
|
|
gptkbp:outcome
|
Overturned a Virginia law
|
|
gptkbp:precedent
|
Subsequent commercial speech cases
|
|
gptkbp:public_perception
|
gptkb:Justice_Harry_Blackmun
|
|
gptkbp:related_cases
|
gptkb:Virginia_Board_of_Pharmacy_v._Virginia_Citizens_Consumer_Council
|
|
gptkbp:significance
|
Expanded commercial speech protections
|
|
gptkbp:year
|
gptkb:1975
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:Virginia_Board_of_Pharmacy_v._Virginia_Citizens_Consumer_Council
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
7
|