|
gptkbp:instanceOf
|
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
|
|
gptkbp:arguedDate
|
November 28, 2001
|
|
gptkbp:citation
|
535 U.S. 564
|
|
gptkbp:concurringOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Justice_Breyer
gptkb:Justice_O'Connor
|
|
gptkbp:date
|
May 13, 2002
|
|
gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Justice_Stevens
|
|
gptkbp:docketNumber
|
00-1293
|
|
gptkbp:followedBy
|
gptkb:Ashcroft_v._ACLU_(2004)
|
|
gptkbp:fullName
|
Ashcroft, Attorney General v. American Civil Liberties Union
|
|
gptkbp:heldBy
|
The Child Online Protection Act's use of 'community standards' to identify material harmful to minors does not by itself render the statute substantially overbroad for First Amendment purposes.
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
Ashcroft v. ACLU (2002)
|
|
gptkbp:joinedBy
|
gptkb:Chief_Justice_William_Rehnquist
gptkb:Justice_David_Souter
gptkb:Justice_Stephen_Breyer
gptkb:Justice_John_Paul_Stevens
gptkb:Justice_Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg
gptkb:Justice_Anthony_Kennedy
gptkb:Justice_Antonin_Scalia
gptkb:Justice_Sandra_Day_O'Connor
|
|
gptkbp:legalImpact
|
Addressed constitutionality of internet content regulation
|
|
gptkbp:location
|
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court
|
|
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Justice_Clarence_Thomas
|
|
gptkbp:petitioner
|
gptkb:John_Ashcroft
|
|
gptkbp:precededBy
|
gptkb:Reno_v._ACLU
|
|
gptkbp:relatedTo
|
gptkb:Reno_v._ACLU
gptkb:Ashcroft_v._ACLU_(2004)
|
|
gptkbp:response
|
gptkb:American_Civil_Liberties_Union
|
|
gptkbp:subject
|
gptkb:Child_Online_Protection_Act
gptkb:First_Amendment
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:Child_Online_Protection_Act
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
7
|