Statements (49)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:legal_case
|
| gptkbp:area |
Water law
|
| gptkbp:case_number |
Original No. 10
|
| gptkbp:case_outcome |
Allocation of Colorado River water
|
| gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court
1952-03-10 |
| gptkbp:dissenting_opinion |
gptkb:Dissent_by_Justice_Jackson
Dissent by Justice Frankfurter |
| gptkbp:historical_context |
Development of the American Southwest
Post-World War II water demand |
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Arizona v. California
|
| gptkbp:impact |
Environmental regulations
Water management policies Water conservation efforts Water quality regulations Water infrastructure development Interstate compacts Public awareness of water issues Climate change considerations Agricultural water use policies Federal water policy Indigenous water rights issues Interstate relations regarding water Judicial interpretations of water law Legal education on water law Legal frameworks for interstate disputes State water rights negotiations Urban water supply strategies Western United States water policy |
| gptkbp:influenced_by |
1931 Colorado River Compact
1944 Mexican Water Treaty |
| gptkbp:involved_parties |
gptkb:State_of_Arizona
gptkb:State_of_California |
| gptkbp:involves |
gptkb:Colorado_River
water rights |
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
Subsequent Supreme Court cases
|
| gptkbp:judicial_review |
Majority opinion by Justice Felix Frankfurter
|
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
gptkb:Attorney_General_of_California
gptkb:Attorney_General_of_Arizona |
| gptkbp:legislation |
gptkb:Colorado_River_Storage_Project_Act
Boulder Canyon Project Act |
| gptkbp:outcome |
Supreme Court ruling in favor of California
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
future water rights cases
|
| gptkbp:related_to |
gptkb:Gila_River
Lower Basin states Upper Basin states |
| gptkbp:significance |
Interstate water allocation
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Texas_v._Oregon
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
6
|