|
gptkbp:instanceOf
|
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
|
|
gptkbp:citation
|
gptkb:444_U.S._51
|
|
gptkbp:date
|
1979
|
|
gptkbp:decidedBy
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
|
gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy
|
gptkb:William_Rehnquist
|
|
gptkbp:heldBy
|
The government may regulate the sale of property without providing compensation, even if the regulation eliminates the property's economic value, as long as the owner retains other rights of ownership.
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
Andrus v. Allard (1979)
|
|
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Byron_White
gptkb:Thurgood_Marshall
gptkb:John_Paul_Stevens
gptkb:Warren_E._Burger
gptkb:Potter_Stewart
gptkb:William_J._Brennan,_Jr.
gptkb:Harry_Blackmun
gptkb:Lewis_F._Powell,_Jr.
|
|
gptkbp:petitioner
|
John C. Andrus, Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
|
|
gptkbp:principle
|
Regulation of property use does not always require compensation under the Takings Clause.
|
|
gptkbp:relatedLegislation
|
gptkb:Bald_and_Golden_Eagle_Protection_Act
gptkb:Migratory_Bird_Treaty_Act
|
|
gptkbp:response
|
gptkb:Allard
|
|
gptkbp:subject
|
gptkb:Fifth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
gptkb:Takings_Clause
Wildlife regulation
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:Migratory_Bird_Treaty_Act_(USA)
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
7
|