Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.

GPTKB entity

Predicate	Object
gptkbp:instanceOf	gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
gptkbp:citation	gptkb:477_U.S._242
gptkbp:concurringOpinionBy	gptkb:William_H._Rehnquist
gptkbp:country	gptkb:United_States
gptkbp:date	1986-06-25
gptkbp:decidedBy	gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy	gptkb:Thurgood_Marshall gptkb:William_J._Brennan_Jr. gptkb:Harry_Blackmun
gptkbp:docketNumber	84-1602
gptkbp:heldBy	The standard for summary judgment mirrors the standard for a directed verdict under Rule 50(a). In libel cases, the evidence must be such that a reasonable jury could find actual malice.
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.
gptkbp:legalSubject	defamation summary judgment
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy	gptkb:Byron_White
gptkbp:partOf	1985 Term of the Supreme Court of the United States
gptkbp:predecessor	summary judgment standard in federal courts
gptkbp:bfsParent	gptkb:477_U.S._57 gptkb:Federal_Rules_of_Civil_Procedure_Rule_56
gptkbp:bfsLayer	7