Amgen Inc. v. Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust Funds

GPTKB entity

Predicate	Object
gptkbp:instanceOf	gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
gptkbp:arguedDate	November 5, 2012
gptkbp:citation	133 S. Ct. 1184 185 L. Ed. 2d 308 568 U.S. 455
gptkbp:concurringOpinionBy	gptkb:Justice_Alito
gptkbp:courtTerm	2012 term
gptkbp:date	February 27, 2013
gptkbp:decidedBy	gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy	gptkb:Justice_Kennedy gptkb:Justice_Scalia gptkb:Justice_Thomas
gptkbp:docketNumber	11-1085
gptkbp:heldBy	Plaintiffs in securities fraud class actions need not prove materiality of alleged misstatements at the class certification stage.
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	Amgen Inc. v. Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust Funds
gptkbp:legalSubject	securities fraud
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy	gptkb:Justice_Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg
gptkbp:petitioner	gptkb:Amgen_Inc.
gptkbp:relatedTo	gptkb:Basic_Inc._v._Levinson Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23
gptkbp:response	Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust Funds
gptkbp:bfsParent	gptkb:Basic_Inc._v._Levinson
gptkbp:bfsLayer	7