|
gptkbp:instanceOf
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_India_judgment
|
|
gptkbp:alsoKnownAs
|
gptkb:Aadhaar_case
|
|
gptkbp:citation
|
(2019) 1 SCC 1
|
|
gptkbp:country
|
gptkb:India
|
|
gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy
|
gptkb:D._Y._Chandrachud
|
|
gptkbp:heldBy
|
Aadhaar can be made mandatory for welfare schemes
Aadhaar cannot be made mandatory for bank accounts
Aadhaar is constitutionally valid
Aadhaar cannot be made mandatory for mobile connections
Section 57 of Aadhaar Act is unconstitutional
|
|
gptkbp:impact
|
Clarified scope of right to privacy in India
Limited use of Aadhaar authentication by private entities
|
|
gptkbp:judge
|
gptkb:Dipak_Misra
gptkb:A._M._Khanwilkar
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_India
gptkb:D._Y._Chandrachud
gptkb:A._K._Sikri
gptkb:Ashok_Bhushan
|
|
gptkbp:judgmentDate
|
2018-09-26
|
|
gptkbp:officialName
|
gptkb:Justice_K.S._Puttaswamy_(Retd.)_&_Anr._v._Union_of_India_&_Ors.
|
|
gptkbp:powers
|
5
|
|
gptkbp:relatedTo
|
gptkb:Right_to_Privacy
gptkb:Article_21_of_the_Constitution_of_India
gptkb:Aadhaar_Act,_2016
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:Dhananjaya_Y._Chandrachud
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
6
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
Aadhaar judgment
|