Statements (29)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
|
| gptkbp:citation |
(2019) 1 SCC 1
|
| gptkbp:country |
gptkb:India
|
| gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy |
gptkb:Justice_D.Y._Chandrachud
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Aadhaar case
|
| gptkbp:impact |
Clarified scope of right to privacy in India
Set limits on use of Aadhaar by private entities Upheld Aadhaar for welfare delivery |
| gptkbp:judge |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_India
|
| gptkbp:judgmentDate |
2018-09-26
|
| gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy |
Justice A.K. Sikri
|
| gptkbp:numberOfIssues |
Right to privacy
Constitutionality of Aadhaar Act, 2016 Mandatory use of Aadhaar for welfare schemes Linking Aadhaar with bank accounts and mobile numbers |
| gptkbp:officialName |
Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) & Anr. vs Union of India & Ors.
|
| gptkbp:petitioner |
gptkb:K.S._Puttaswamy
|
| gptkbp:powers |
5-judge Constitution Bench
|
| gptkbp:relatedLegislation |
gptkb:Aadhaar_(Targeted_Delivery_of_Financial_and_Other_Subsidies,_Benefits_and_Services)_Act,_2016
|
| gptkbp:relatedTo |
Right to privacy
K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India (2017) (Right to Privacy judgment) |
| gptkbp:response |
gptkb:Union_of_India
|
| gptkbp:verdict |
Aadhaar constitutional with restrictions
Aadhaar mandatory for welfare schemes Aadhaar not mandatory for bank accounts Aadhaar not mandatory for mobile numbers Section 57 of Aadhaar Act struck down in part |
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Aadhaar_judgment
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
6
|