AT& T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion
GPTKB entity
Statements (66)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:legal_case
|
| gptkbp:affects |
class action lawsuits
|
| gptkbp:case_number |
09-893
|
| gptkbp:case_outcome |
gptkb:legal_case
dispute resolution dispute resolution mechanisms contract law consumer protection laws consumer advocacy contract enforceability federal preemption legal framework for arbitration consumer contracts business accountability class action arbitration judicial review of arbitration agreements arbitration enforcement arbitration law evolution business arbitration agreements business arbitration practices business litigation outcomes business litigation strategies consumer arbitration clauses consumer arbitration rights judicial interpretation of arbitration agreements legal challenges to arbitration legal implications for contracts legal landscape for arbitration legal rights of consumers legal standards for arbitration legal strategies for consumers regulatory authority of states state regulation of arbitration |
| gptkbp:case_significance |
gptkb:cultural_landmark
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court
|
| gptkbp:date |
November 9, 2010
|
| gptkbp:decided_by |
April 27, 2011
5-4 decision |
| gptkbp:dissenting_opinion |
gptkb:Justice_Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg
gptkb:Justice_Stephen_Breyer |
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
AT& T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion
|
| gptkbp:impact |
gptkb:business_practices
consumer rights consumer arbitration agreements |
| gptkbp:involved_parties |
gptkb:AT&_T_Mobility_LLC
gptkb:Vincent_Concepcion |
| gptkbp:involved_statutes |
gptkb:California_Civil_Code_§_1670.5
Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U. S. C. § 1 et seq. |
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
563 U. S. 333
|
| gptkbp:judicial_review |
Supreme Court review
|
| gptkbp:legal_context |
gptkb:Federal_Arbitration_Act
California law on unconscionability |
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
arbitration agreements
|
| gptkbp:legal_outcome |
invalidated California law
upheld arbitration agreement |
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
enforceability of arbitration clauses
|
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
attorneys for AT& T
attorneys for Concepcion |
| gptkbp:outcome |
enforced arbitration agreement
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
arbitration law
|
| gptkbp:public_perception |
gptkb:Justice_Antonin_Scalia
|
| gptkbp:related_cases |
gptkb:American_Express_Co._v._Italian_Colors_Restaurant
gptkb:Discover_Bank_v._Superior_Court |
| gptkbp:significance |
preemption of state laws
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Epic_Systems_Corp._v._Lewis
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
5
|