Statements (20)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
|
| gptkbp:bench |
M.C. Mahajan, S.R. Das, Vivian Bose, Ghulam Hasan, B.K. Mukherjea
|
| gptkbp:citation |
gptkb:AIR_1954_SC_300
|
| gptkbp:country |
gptkb:India
|
| gptkbp:date |
1951
1954 |
| gptkbp:decision |
Certain provisions of the Bombay Prohibition Act held unconstitutional
|
| gptkbp:fullName |
State of Bombay v. F.N. Balsara
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
AIR 1954 SC 300
|
| gptkbp:importantFor |
Landmark case on fundamental rights and reasonable restrictions
|
| gptkbp:judge |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_India
|
| gptkbp:legalIssue |
Constitutionality of Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949
|
| gptkbp:legalProvision |
gptkb:Article_14_of_the_Constitution_of_India
Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 |
| gptkbp:petitioner |
State of Bombay
|
| gptkbp:response |
F.N. Balsara
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:M.P._Sharma_v._Satish_Chandra
gptkb:M.P._Sharma_vs_Satish_Chandra_(1954) |
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
7
|