|
gptkbp:instanceOf
|
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
|
|
gptkbp:citation
|
gptkb:Puttaswamy_v._Union_of_India
gptkb:Justice_K._S._Puttaswamy_(Retd.)_v._Union_of_India
gptkb:Subhash_Kashinath_Mahajan_v._State_of_Maharashtra
AIR 1976 SC 1207
|
|
gptkbp:country
|
gptkb:India
|
|
gptkbp:criticizedFor
|
undermining fundamental rights
|
|
gptkbp:date
|
April 28, 1976
|
|
gptkbp:decidedBy
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_India
|
|
gptkbp:dissentingOpinion
|
H. R. Khanna held that right to life and liberty cannot be suspended even during Emergency
|
|
gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy
|
gptkb:H._R._Khanna
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
ADM Jabalpur case
|
|
gptkbp:impact
|
led to debate on judicial independence
|
|
gptkbp:judge
|
gptkb:A._N._Ray
gptkb:H._R._Khanna
gptkb:M._H._Beg
gptkb:P._N._Bhagwati
gptkb:Y._V._Chandrachud
|
|
gptkbp:language
|
English
|
|
gptkbp:legacy
|
considered a dark chapter in Indian judicial history
|
|
gptkbp:legalIssue
|
gptkb:Article_21_of_the_Constitution_of_India
suspension of habeas corpus
right to life and personal liberty
|
|
gptkbp:officialName
|
gptkb:Additional_District_Magistrate,_Jabalpur_v._Shiv_Kant_Shukla
|
|
gptkbp:overruledBy
|
gptkb:Puttaswamy_v._Union_of_India_(2017)
|
|
gptkbp:popularFor
|
gptkb:Habeas_Corpus_case
|
|
gptkbp:powers
|
5
|
|
gptkbp:relatedTo
|
gptkb:Indian_Emergency_(1975–1977)
gptkb:Puttaswamy_v._Union_of_India
gptkb:Maneka_Gandhi_v._Union_of_India
gptkb:Keshavananda_Bharati_v._State_of_Kerala
|
|
gptkbp:subject
|
gptkb:constitutional_law
Civil liberties
Emergency powers
|
|
gptkbp:subjectOf
|
gptkb:military
legal scholarship
judicial criticism
|
|
gptkbp:verdict
|
majority held that right to habeas corpus can be suspended during Emergency
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:The_Emergency
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
6
|