Statements (94)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:legal_case
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
3
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:ACLU_of_Ohio
|
| gptkbp:advocates_for |
civil rights
|
| gptkbp:affiliated_with |
civil rights groups
|
| gptkbp:applies_to |
gptkb:ACLU_of_Ohio
|
| gptkbp:case_types |
available for public review
1:20-cv-00345 court filings available overview of legal proceedings |
| gptkbp:community_engagement |
civil liberties
protection of civil liberties |
| gptkbp:consequences |
government accountability
affects law enforcement practices |
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Governor_Mike_De_Wine
gptkb:political_movement gptkb:State_of_Ohio gptkb:legal_case constitutional rights |
| gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:legal_case
|
| gptkbp:effective_date |
July 2020
|
| gptkbp:future_plans |
free speech advocacy
|
| gptkbp:historical_debate |
public safety concerns
state interests |
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
ACLU of Ohio v. De Wine
|
| gptkbp:impact |
protest regulations
protests during COVID-19 pandemic |
| gptkbp:influenced_by |
gptkb:Black_Lives_Matter_movement
|
| gptkbp:involves |
gptkb:political_movement
gptkb:Mike_De_Wine |
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
ACLU of Ohio v. De Wine, 2020
|
| gptkbp:is_involved_in |
gptkb:political_movement
gptkb:Mike_De_Wine gptkb:ACLU_of_Ohio |
| gptkbp:issues |
police conduct
|
| gptkbp:judicial_review |
gptkb:legal_case
detailed legal reasoning |
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
gptkb:Ohio
|
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
gptkb:freedom_of_assembly
gptkb:freedom_of_expression gptkb:legal_case First Amendment rights federal judiciary COVID-19 restrictions First Amendment jurisprudence upholding constitutional rights unconstitutional restrictions against state government actions emergency powers during pandemic |
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
gptkb:ACLU_Foundation
|
| gptkbp:legislation |
gptkb:Ohio_Revised_Code
constitutional law Ohio House Bill 248 |
| gptkbp:major_city |
policy changes
|
| gptkbp:media_coverage |
national news
national attention |
| gptkbp:notable_event |
gptkb:ACLU_of_Ohio_v._Ohio_State_Highway_Patrol
protest rights cases |
| gptkbp:outcome |
gptkb:memorial
gptkb:majority_opinion gptkb:Settlement policy reform influenced public discourse legal scholars resolved settlement reached discussed in legal forums unconstitutional actions upheld First Amendment rights free speech protections influenced state policies shaped future protests strengthened advocacy efforts raised awareness of civil liberties affirmed civil rights examined free speech implications ongoing civil rights debates preliminary injunction granted ruled in favor of ACLU supported free assembly rights |
| gptkbp:precedent |
First Amendment jurisprudence
affects future cases on free speech guides future litigation |
| gptkbp:public_perception |
gptkb:none
support for civil rights support for ACLU |
| gptkbp:published_year |
February 2020
April 2020 |
| gptkbp:related_event |
protests in Ohio
|
| gptkbp:related_to |
freedom of speech
public protests |
| gptkbp:significance |
impact on protest rights
|
| gptkbp:state |
gptkb:Ohio
|
| gptkbp:year |
gptkb:2020
|