A.L.A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States

GPTKB entity

Statements (38)
Predicate Object
gptkbp:instanceOf gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
gptkbp:alsoKnownAs gptkb:Schechter_Poultry_Corp._v._United_States
gptkbp:arguedDate May 2, 1935
gptkbp:category gptkb:United_States_Commerce_Clause_case_law
United States separation of powers case law
1935 in United States case law
United States Supreme Court cases of the Hughes Court
gptkbp:citation 295 U.S. 495
gptkbp:concurringOpinionBy gptkb:Benjamin_N._Cardozo
gptkb:Louis_Brandeis
gptkb:Harlan_F._Stone
gptkbp:date May 27, 1935
gptkbp:decidedBy gptkb:Hughes_Court
gptkbp:defendant gptkb:United_States
gptkbp:docketNumber 854
gptkbp:heldBy Congress cannot delegate legislative power to the President
The National Industrial Recovery Act was unconstitutional
Congress cannot regulate intrastate commerce that only indirectly affects interstate commerce
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label A.L.A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States
gptkbp:impact limited New Deal legislation
strengthened nondelegation doctrine
restricted federal regulation of local business activities
gptkbp:judge gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
gptkbp:location gptkb:New_York_City
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy gptkb:Charles_Evans_Hughes
gptkbp:pages 495
gptkbp:plaintiff gptkb:A.L.A._Schechter_Poultry_Corporation
gptkbp:predecessor Commerce Clause interpretation
limits on federal regulatory power
nondelegation doctrine cases
gptkbp:relatedLegislation gptkb:National_Industrial_Recovery_Act
gptkbp:subject gptkb:Nondelegation_doctrine
gptkb:Separation_of_powers
Commerce Clause
gptkbp:unanimousDecision true
gptkbp:volume 295
gptkbp:bfsParent gptkb:Supreme_Court_decision_in_Schechter_Poultry_Corp._v._United_States
gptkbp:bfsLayer 5