|
gptkbp:instanceOf
|
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
|
|
gptkbp:arguedDate
|
1966-03-01
1966-02-28
|
|
gptkbp:category
|
United States Supreme Court cases
1966 in United States case law
United States criminal procedure case law
United States Fifth Amendment self-incrimination case law
|
|
gptkbp:citation
|
gptkb:383_U.S._463
|
|
gptkbp:concurringOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Hugo_Black
gptkb:William_O._Douglas
gptkb:Tom_C._Clark
gptkb:Abe_Fortas
|
|
gptkbp:country
|
gptkb:United_States
|
|
gptkbp:date
|
1966-06-13
|
|
gptkbp:decidedBy
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
|
gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Byron_White
gptkb:Potter_Stewart
gptkb:John_Marshall_Harlan_II
|
|
gptkbp:docketNumber
|
759
|
|
gptkbp:fullName
|
gptkb:Ernesto_A._Miranda_v._State_of_Arizona
|
|
gptkbp:heldBy
|
The prosecution may not use statements arising from a custodial interrogation of a suspect unless certain procedural safeguards were in place to protect the suspect's Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination.
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
383 U.S. 463
|
|
gptkbp:legalSubject
|
gptkb:Fifth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
gptkb:Miranda_rights
gptkb:Sixth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
|
|
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Earl_Warren
|
|
gptkbp:majorityOpinionFor
|
5
|
|
gptkbp:officialName
|
gptkb:Miranda_v._Arizona
|
|
gptkbp:pages
|
463
|
|
gptkbp:predecessor
|
gptkb:Miranda_warning
|
|
gptkbp:relatedTo
|
gptkb:California_v._Stewart
gptkb:Vignera_v._New_York
gptkb:Westover_v._United_States
|
|
gptkbp:reporter
|
gptkb:United_States_Reports
|
|
gptkbp:volume
|
383
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:Ginzburg_v._United_States
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
7
|