|
gptkbp:instanceOf
|
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
|
|
gptkbp:arguedDate
|
1947-03-11
1947-03-10
|
|
gptkbp:citation
|
gptkb:332_U.S._442
|
|
gptkbp:concurringOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Frank_Murphy
gptkb:Wiley_Blount_Rutledge
|
|
gptkbp:date
|
1947-06-23
|
|
gptkbp:decidedBy
|
gptkb:Fred_M._Vinson
|
|
gptkbp:defendant
|
gptkb:United_States_Gypsum_Company
|
|
gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Hugo_Black
gptkb:William_O._Douglas
gptkb:Robert_H._Jackson
|
|
gptkbp:docketNumber
|
59
|
|
gptkbp:heldBy
|
Criminal intent is required for conviction under the Sherman Act.
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
332 U.S. 442
|
|
gptkbp:judge
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
|
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Fred_M._Vinson
|
|
gptkbp:officialName
|
gptkb:United_States_v._United_States_Gypsum_Co.
|
|
gptkbp:pages
|
442
|
|
gptkbp:plaintiff
|
gptkb:United_States
|
|
gptkbp:relatedTo
|
gptkb:United_States_v._United_States_Gypsum_Co.
|
|
gptkbp:reporter
|
gptkb:United_States_Reports
|
|
gptkbp:subject
|
gptkb:Sherman_Antitrust_Act
antitrust law
|
|
gptkbp:volume
|
332
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:Cox_v._United_States
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
7
|