Statements (108)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:legal_case
|
| gptkbp:advocates_for |
compelled speech
discrimination laws |
| gptkbp:case_types |
21-476
|
| gptkbp:consequences |
federal civil rights laws
state anti-discrimination laws |
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court
|
| gptkbp:decided_by |
December 5, 2022
|
| gptkbp:historical_debate |
November 2022
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
303 Creative LLC v. Elenis
|
| gptkbp:impact |
gptkb:freedom_of_expression
gptkb:technique religious freedom civil rights protections |
| gptkbp:involves |
First Amendment rights
LGBTQ+ rights free speech |
| gptkbp:is_involved_in |
gptkb:Cynthia_G._Smith
gptkb:303_Creative_LLC |
| gptkbp:issues |
gptkb:same-sex_marriage
public accommodation laws website design services |
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
gptkb:United_States
federal |
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
gptkb:freedom_of_expression
First Amendment rights civil rights business rights public accommodation laws |
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
gptkb:political_movement
gptkb:Alliance_Defending_Freedom |
| gptkbp:legislation |
gptkb:Equality_Act
gptkb:Religious_Freedom_Restoration_Act |
| gptkbp:notable_event |
gptkb:Masterpiece_Cakeshop_v._Colorado_Civil_Rights_Commission
gptkb:Baker_v._Vermont |
| gptkbp:outcome |
landmark decision
sets precedent for future cases influences state policies pending decision affects legal strategies of advocacy groups shapes future legal arguments affects public opinion on LGBTQ+ issues favor of 303 Creative LLC guides business practices informs judicial interpretations of rights ruled that the state could not compel speech sparks national debate on rights upheld the right to refuse service based on beliefs |
| gptkbp:party |
gptkb:Jared_Polis
gptkb:303_Creative_LLC |
| gptkbp:precedent |
free speech
religious freedom potential impact on future cases |
| gptkbp:public_perception |
gptkb:Justice_Alito
gptkb:Justice_Sotomayor gptkb:Justice_Kagan gptkb:Justice_Gorsuch mixed reactions criticism from LGBTQ+ advocates support from conservative groups |
| gptkbp:related_to |
gptkb:legislation
gptkb:award gptkb:political_movement gptkb:legal_frameworks gptkb:legal_reforms gptkb:public_opinion gptkb:television_channel gptkb:Masterpiece_Cakeshop_v._Colorado_Civil_Rights_Commission gptkb:legal_case public interest advocacy groups creative expression constitutional law court decisions judicial review legal challenges civil liberties political implications legal precedents legal standards court procedures legal interpretations judicial decisions legal arguments court rulings constitutional rights court opinions judicial activism legal ethics legal history court interpretations business rights equal protection clause discrimination laws free exercise clause legal doctrines judicial principles court rulings history |
| gptkbp:significance |
impact on LGBTQ+ rights
implications for anti-discrimination laws implications for creative professionals impact on creative professionals |
| gptkbp:sound |
November 2022
|
| gptkbp:state |
gptkb:Colorado
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Neil_Gorsuch
gptkb:Justice_Alito gptkb:Brett_Kavanaugh |
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
4
|