Triple

T8936499
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Public Law 110-403 E212789 entity
Predicate establishesPosition P4417 FINISHED
Object United States Intellectual Property Enforcement Coordinator E5608 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (3 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: United States Intellectual Property Enforcement Coordinator | Statement: [Public Law 110-403, establishesPosition, United States Intellectual Property Enforcement Coordinator]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: United States Intellectual Property Enforcement Coordinator
Context triple: [Public Law 110-403, establishesPosition, United States Intellectual Property Enforcement Coordinator]
  • A. Office of the United States Intellectual Property Enforcement Coordinator chosen
    The Office of the United States Intellectual Property Enforcement Coordinator is a federal office that develops and oversees the U.S. government’s overall strategy for protecting and enforcing intellectual property rights domestically and internationally.
  • B. Special Counsel for the United States Department of Justice
    The Special Counsel for the United States Department of Justice is an independent prosecutor appointed to investigate and potentially prosecute sensitive matters where the Department’s own involvement could present a conflict of interest.
  • C. Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
    The Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office is the chief executive official responsible for leading the nation’s patent and trademark system and setting policy for the protection of intellectual property in the United States.
  • D. United States Mission to the World Intellectual Property Organization
    The United States Mission to the World Intellectual Property Organization is the U.S. diplomatic representation responsible for advancing American intellectual property and related policy interests at WIPO in Geneva.
  • E. Director General of WIPO
    The Director General of WIPO is the chief executive officer of the World Intellectual Property Organization, responsible for leading its global intellectual property policy, administration, and strategic direction.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: establishesPosition
Context triple: [Public Law 110-403, establishesPosition, United States Intellectual Property Enforcement Coordinator]
  • A. positionEstablishedFor
    Indicates that a specific role or job position has been formally created or set up for a particular entity or purpose.
  • B. positionEstablishedIn
    Indicates the point in time or event when a particular position, role, or office was formally created or instituted.
  • C. initiatingPosition
    Indicates the starting location or initial spatial position from which an action, process, or movement begins.
  • D. initiallyPositionedAs
    Indicates that one entity’s starting or original position is specified relative to another entity or reference frame.
  • E. createsPosition chosen
    Indicates that one entity establishes or originates a new role, job, or position for another entity or within an organization.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca839694c88190b324ffeb43d23b08 completed March 30, 2026, 2:07 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cc66b3628881909544507628980c25 completed April 1, 2026, 12:28 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69cfc937ded08190a67fd4457b6458ff completed April 3, 2026, 2:05 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cc5ed3286c8190a21de2ee11f2639f completed March 31, 2026, 11:54 p.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:58 p.m.