Triple
T8936499
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Public Law 110-403 |
E212789
|
entity |
| Predicate | establishesPosition |
P4417
|
FINISHED |
| Object | United States Intellectual Property Enforcement Coordinator |
E5608
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (3 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: United States Intellectual Property Enforcement Coordinator | Statement: [Public Law 110-403, establishesPosition, United States Intellectual Property Enforcement Coordinator]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: United States Intellectual Property Enforcement Coordinator Context triple: [Public Law 110-403, establishesPosition, United States Intellectual Property Enforcement Coordinator]
-
A.
Office of the United States Intellectual Property Enforcement Coordinator
chosen
The Office of the United States Intellectual Property Enforcement Coordinator is a federal office that develops and oversees the U.S. government’s overall strategy for protecting and enforcing intellectual property rights domestically and internationally.
-
B.
Special Counsel for the United States Department of Justice
The Special Counsel for the United States Department of Justice is an independent prosecutor appointed to investigate and potentially prosecute sensitive matters where the Department’s own involvement could present a conflict of interest.
-
C.
Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
The Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office is the chief executive official responsible for leading the nation’s patent and trademark system and setting policy for the protection of intellectual property in the United States.
-
D.
United States Mission to the World Intellectual Property Organization
The United States Mission to the World Intellectual Property Organization is the U.S. diplomatic representation responsible for advancing American intellectual property and related policy interests at WIPO in Geneva.
-
E.
Director General of WIPO
The Director General of WIPO is the chief executive officer of the World Intellectual Property Organization, responsible for leading its global intellectual property policy, administration, and strategic direction.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: establishesPosition Context triple: [Public Law 110-403, establishesPosition, United States Intellectual Property Enforcement Coordinator]
-
A.
positionEstablishedFor
Indicates that a specific role or job position has been formally created or set up for a particular entity or purpose.
-
B.
positionEstablishedIn
Indicates the point in time or event when a particular position, role, or office was formally created or instituted.
-
C.
initiatingPosition
Indicates the starting location or initial spatial position from which an action, process, or movement begins.
-
D.
initiallyPositionedAs
Indicates that one entity’s starting or original position is specified relative to another entity or reference frame.
-
E.
createsPosition
chosen
Indicates that one entity establishes or originates a new role, job, or position for another entity or within an organization.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca839694c88190b324ffeb43d23b08 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:07 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cc66b3628881909544507628980c25 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 12:28 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69cfc937ded08190a67fd4457b6458ff |
completed | April 3, 2026, 2:05 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cc5ed3286c8190a21de2ee11f2639f |
completed | March 31, 2026, 11:54 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:58 p.m.