Triple

T7600784
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Kenneth Arrow E179975 entity
Predicate notableWork P4 FINISHED
Object Arrow’s impossibility theorem E115290 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Arrow’s impossibility theorem | Statement: [Kenneth Arrow, notableWork, Arrow’s impossibility theorem]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Arrow’s impossibility theorem
Context triple: [Kenneth Arrow, notableWork, Arrow’s impossibility theorem]
  • A. Arrow’s impossibility theorem chosen
    Arrow’s impossibility theorem is a foundational result in social choice theory showing that no voting system can convert individual preferences into a collective ranking while simultaneously satisfying a set of seemingly reasonable fairness criteria.
  • B. Gibbard–Satterthwaite theorem
    The Gibbard–Satterthwaite theorem is a fundamental result in social choice theory showing that every reasonable voting system with at least three options is susceptible to strategic manipulation by voters.
  • C. Social Choice and Individual Values
    Social Choice and Individual Values is a foundational 1951 book by economist Kenneth Arrow that established modern social choice theory and introduced Arrow’s impossibility theorem.
  • D. Condorcet paradox
    The Condorcet paradox is a voting theory phenomenon where collective preferences can become cyclic and inconsistent, even when individual voters’ preferences are perfectly rational and transitive.
  • E. Collective Choice and Social Welfare
    Collective Choice and Social Welfare is a foundational work in social choice theory that rigorously examines how individual preferences can be aggregated into collective decisions while addressing issues of welfare, justice, and fairness.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c69f3567008190ab01d2ca7b53584a completed March 27, 2026, 3:16 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c6f9d9c55c8190841f3bf3225c096a completed March 27, 2026, 9:42 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69c861b0649c8190b374b5e81f8ba453 completed March 28, 2026, 11:18 p.m.
Created at: March 27, 2026, 3:53 p.m.