Triple
T7476629
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Timbs v. Indiana |
E176646
|
entity |
| Predicate | ThomasConcurrenceBasis |
P33112
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Privileges or Immunities Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment |
E2677
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (3 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Privileges or Immunities Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment | Statement: [Timbs v. Indiana, ThomasConcurrenceBasis, Privileges or Immunities Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Privileges or Immunities Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment Context triple: [Timbs v. Indiana, ThomasConcurrenceBasis, Privileges or Immunities Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment]
-
A.
Privileges and Immunities Clause
chosen
The Privileges and Immunities Clause is a constitutional provision that prevents states from discriminating against citizens of other states in fundamental rights such as access to courts, property, and employment.
-
B.
Equal Protection Clause
The Equal Protection Clause is a key constitutional provision that prohibits states from denying any person within their jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws, forming the basis for many landmark civil rights decisions in the United States.
-
C.
Section 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment
Section 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment, known as the Enforcement Clause, grants Congress the power to pass legislation to uphold the amendment’s guarantees of equal protection and due process.
-
D.
Fourteenth Amendment
The Fourteenth Amendment is a key post–Civil War addition to the U.S. Constitution that guarantees citizenship, due process, and equal protection under the law, forming the foundation of many modern civil rights protections.
-
E.
Full Faith and Credit Clause
The Full Faith and Credit Clause is a provision of the U.S. Constitution that requires states to recognize and honor the public acts, records, and judicial proceedings of other states.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: ThomasConcurrenceBasis Context triple: [Timbs v. Indiana, ThomasConcurrenceBasis, Privileges or Immunities Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment]
-
A.
concurringJustice
Indicates that a justice agrees with the court’s judgment or outcome but writes or joins a separate concurring opinion expressing different or additional reasoning.
-
B.
hasConcurringJustice
Indicates that a judicial decision is associated with a justice who wrote or joined a concurring opinion.
-
C.
thirdCongruence
Indicates that two geometric figures or angles are congruent as a consequence of a third congruence relationship (e.g., by transitivity or a third-angle/side congruence rule).
-
D.
constitutionalBasisOfHolding
chosen
Indicates that one legal holding is grounded in, justified by, or derived from a specific constitutional provision or principle.
-
E.
concludedBy
Indicates that an event, process, or state is brought to an end or finalized by a specific agent or entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c69f236ce08190a04d7679f03b29b2 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 3:15 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c6f4ee23d081908e05658a651661fc |
completed | March 27, 2026, 9:21 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69c83489a8208190b0380edcd18a1246 |
completed | March 28, 2026, 8:05 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c6f03d967081908a8e696ff9693b90 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 9:01 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 3:41 p.m.