Triple
T7093976
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Lorance v. AT&T Technologies, Inc. |
E165273
|
entity |
| Predicate | parties |
P1790
|
FINISHED |
| Object | AT&T Technologies, Inc. (defendant) |
E89783
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: AT&T Technologies, Inc. (defendant) | Statement: [Lorance v. AT&T Technologies, Inc., parties, AT&T Technologies, Inc. (defendant)]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: AT&T Technologies, Inc. (defendant) Context triple: [Lorance v. AT&T Technologies, Inc., parties, AT&T Technologies, Inc. (defendant)]
-
A.
United States v. AT&T
United States v. AT&T was a landmark antitrust lawsuit in which the U.S. government forced the breakup of the Bell System telecommunications monopoly in the early 1980s.
-
B.
MCI v. AT&T
MCI v. AT&T was a landmark U.S. antitrust lawsuit in the telecommunications industry that challenged AT&T’s monopoly and helped open the long-distance market to competition.
-
C.
AT&T
chosen
AT&T is a major American telecommunications conglomerate known for providing wireless, internet, and media services nationwide.
-
D.
Lorance v. AT&T Technologies, Inc.
Lorance v. AT&T Technologies, Inc. is a 1989 U.S. Supreme Court employment discrimination case that restricted when workers could challenge discriminatory seniority systems, prompting Congress to overturn its effect through the Civil Rights Act of 1991.
-
E.
Nextel Communications
Nextel Communications was a major U.S. wireless telecommunications company best known for its push-to-talk mobile services before its merger with Sprint.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c6887e8c10819091cee237560d32da |
completed | March 27, 2026, 1:39 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c6e55159848190a794ad77e60c5525 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 8:15 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69c79c9adce081908b571c64e5d8222f |
completed | March 28, 2026, 9:17 a.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 2:41 p.m.