Triple

T655573
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Fulton v. City of Philadelphia E11639 entity
Predicate relatedTo P37 FINISHED
Object Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission E5194 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission | Statement: [Fulton v. City of Philadelphia, relatedTo, Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission
Context triple: [Fulton v. City of Philadelphia, relatedTo, Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission]
  • A. Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission chosen
    Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission is a 2018 U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled, on narrow grounds, that Colorado officials had shown unconstitutional hostility toward a baker’s religious beliefs when enforcing anti-discrimination laws against his refusal to create a wedding cake for a same-sex couple.
  • B. Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd.
    Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. is a Colorado bakery best known for its central role in a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case involving religious freedom and anti-discrimination laws.
  • C. Colorado Department of State v. Baca
    Colorado Department of State v. Baca is a U.S. federal court case addressing whether states can remove or sanction presidential electors who refuse to vote in accordance with their state's popular vote in the Electoral College.
  • D. City of Boerne v. Flores
    City of Boerne v. Flores is a 1997 U.S. Supreme Court case that curtailed Congress’s power under the Fourteenth Amendment and held that the Religious Freedom Restoration Act could not be applied to the states.
  • E. DeBoer v. Snyder
    DeBoer v. Snyder was a federal court case challenging Michigan’s same-sex marriage ban that became one of the key cases consolidated into the landmark Supreme Court decision in Obergefell v. Hodges, which legalized same-sex marriage nationwide.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a4932862a0819098be659c814e4981 completed March 1, 2026, 7:27 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a49f4d57688190a9515ac494a97b22 completed March 1, 2026, 8:19 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69a5914abe2c8190a27f520f445554d8 completed March 2, 2026, 1:31 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:36 p.m.