Triple

T568425
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject liar paradox E13608 entity
Predicate relatedTo P37 FINISHED
Object Russell's paradox E2517 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Russell's paradox | Statement: [liar paradox, relatedTo, Russell's paradox]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Russell's paradox
Context triple: [liar paradox, relatedTo, Russell's paradox]
  • A. Russell’s paradox chosen
    Russell’s paradox is a foundational logical contradiction in naive set theory that reveals problems with sets that contain themselves, leading to major developments in modern logic and the axiomatization of set theory.
  • B. Burali-Forti paradox
    The Burali-Forti paradox is a foundational logical contradiction in set theory that arises from considering the set of all ordinal numbers, showing that such a totality cannot consistently exist as a set.
  • C. Barber paradox
    The Barber paradox is a self-referential logical puzzle about a barber who shaves all and only those who do not shave themselves, illustrating a contradiction similar to Russell’s paradox.
  • D. Cantor’s paradox
    Cantor’s paradox is a foundational result in set theory showing that the “set of all sets” cannot exist because its power set would have a strictly larger cardinality, leading to a contradiction.
  • E. von Neumann paradox in set theory
    The von Neumann paradox in set theory is a foundational result showing that, under certain group-theoretic conditions, a set can be decomposed and reassembled into paradoxical subsets of equal “size,” illustrating the counterintuitive consequences of the axiom of choice.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a4933fa4d88190a7949cc83c08c5c1 completed March 1, 2026, 7:27 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a49b0406d481908af5fc7bc67103fb completed March 1, 2026, 8:01 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69a5089de648819097efdaa016aa33d2 completed March 2, 2026, 3:48 a.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:33 p.m.