Triple
T54068
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Domain Name System |
E1065
|
entity |
| Predicate | operatesOnLayer |
P2553
|
FINISHED |
| Object | application layer |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: application layer | Statement: [Domain Name System, operatesOnLayer, application layer]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: operatesOnLayer Context triple: [Domain Name System, operatesOnLayer, application layer]
-
A.
operatesWithin
Indicates that one entity carries out its activities, functions, or operations inside the scope, boundaries, or jurisdiction defined by another entity.
-
B.
operatesBy
Indicates that an entity performs its function, action, or process through the use or application of another entity (e.g., a method, mechanism, or principle).
-
C.
operatesInSegment
Indicates that an entity conducts its activities or provides its services within a specified market or operational segment.
-
D.
appliesTo
Indicates that something is relevant, valid, or has effect in relation to a particular entity, case, or context.
-
E.
hasOperationType
Indicates the specific kind or category of operation associated with an entity or process.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a248adc5b48190aa8db9fb092fb28a |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:45 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a24b3a9e848190b80de3c858678b3a |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:56 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a24ac52fb08190aa7c38f83434f795 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:54 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a24b39eef081909cec4333f2b25513 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:56 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:50 a.m.