Triple
T533765
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Inter-American Court of Human Rights |
E12280
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasPrecedentInfluenceOn |
P3138
|
FINISHED |
| Object | domestic courts in the Americas |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: domestic courts in the Americas | Statement: [Inter-American Court of Human Rights, hasPrecedentInfluenceOn, domestic courts in the Americas]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasPrecedentInfluenceOn Context triple: [Inter-American Court of Human Rights, hasPrecedentInfluenceOn, domestic courts in the Americas]
-
A.
influencedCourtDecision
Indicates that one entity had an effect on or contributed to the outcome of a court’s decision regarding another entity or matter.
-
B.
hasHistoricalInfluenceFrom
Indicates that one entity’s characteristics, development, or significance have been shaped or affected by the past actions, ideas, or legacy of another entity.
-
C.
legalDoctrineInfluenced
Indicates that one legal doctrine has shaped, informed, or contributed to the development or interpretation of another legal doctrine.
-
D.
precedentFor
chosen
Indicates that one situation, decision, or case serves as an authoritative example or basis for deciding or interpreting another.
-
E.
precedentInterpreted
Indicates that one legal precedent is interpreted or understood in a particular way, often as clarified or applied in subsequent decisions or analyses.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a4933208e88190891f5debab1b776d |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:27 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4985e51908190a34aa82ea9dbee1e |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:49 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a494b3e49081909810fa417b31306f |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:34 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:32 p.m.