Triple

T5114183
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Arrow’s impossibility theorem E115290 entity
Predicate alsoKnownAs P39 FINISHED
Object Arrow’s general possibility theorem E115290 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Arrow’s general possibility theorem | Statement: [Arrow’s impossibility theorem, alsoKnownAs, Arrow’s general possibility theorem]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Arrow’s general possibility theorem
Context triple: [Arrow’s impossibility theorem, alsoKnownAs, Arrow’s general possibility theorem]
  • A. Arrow’s impossibility theorem chosen
    Arrow’s impossibility theorem is a foundational result in social choice theory showing that no voting system can convert individual preferences into a collective ranking while simultaneously satisfying a set of seemingly reasonable fairness criteria.
  • B. Collective Choice and Social Welfare
    Collective Choice and Social Welfare is a foundational work in social choice theory that rigorously examines how individual preferences can be aggregated into collective decisions while addressing issues of welfare, justice, and fairness.
  • C. Condorcet paradox
    The Condorcet paradox is a voting theory phenomenon where collective preferences can become cyclic and inconsistent, even when individual voters’ preferences are perfectly rational and transitive.
  • D. The Calculus of Consent
    The Calculus of Consent is a foundational work in public choice theory that analyzes how constitutional rules and collective decision-making processes shape political and economic outcomes.
  • E. expected utility theory (with John von Neumann)
    Expected utility theory (with John von Neumann) is a foundational framework in economics and decision theory that models how rational agents make choices under uncertainty by maximizing the expected value of a utility function.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69bd4441d1648190a54a533895041987 completed March 20, 2026, 12:57 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69bd75cd13a08190b53e67ba65333557 completed March 20, 2026, 4:29 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69bebaadfaac8190aa0407196e5c4c20 completed March 21, 2026, 3:35 p.m.
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:41 p.m.