Triple
T5114182
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Arrow’s impossibility theorem |
E115290
|
entity |
| Predicate | alsoKnownAs |
P39
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Arrow’s paradox |
E115290
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Arrow’s paradox | Statement: [Arrow’s impossibility theorem, alsoKnownAs, Arrow’s paradox]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Arrow’s paradox Context triple: [Arrow’s impossibility theorem, alsoKnownAs, Arrow’s paradox]
-
A.
Arrow paradox
The Arrow paradox is an ancient philosophical argument that challenges the coherence of motion by claiming that a flying arrow must be motionless at every instant of its flight.
-
B.
Arrow’s impossibility theorem
chosen
Arrow’s impossibility theorem is a foundational result in social choice theory showing that no voting system can convert individual preferences into a collective ranking while simultaneously satisfying a set of seemingly reasonable fairness criteria.
-
C.
Condorcet paradox
The Condorcet paradox is a voting theory phenomenon where collective preferences can become cyclic and inconsistent, even when individual voters’ preferences are perfectly rational and transitive.
-
D.
Collective Choice and Social Welfare
Collective Choice and Social Welfare is a foundational work in social choice theory that rigorously examines how individual preferences can be aggregated into collective decisions while addressing issues of welfare, justice, and fairness.
-
E.
Sorites paradox
The Sorites paradox is a classic philosophical puzzle about vagueness that questions when the gradual removal or addition of small parts leads to a significant change, such as when a heap of sand stops being a heap.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd4441d1648190a54a533895041987 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 12:57 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd75cd13a08190b53e67ba65333557 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 4:29 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69bebaadfaac8190aa0407196e5c4c20 |
completed | March 21, 2026, 3:35 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:41 p.m.