Triple
T5114176
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Arrow’s impossibility theorem |
E115290
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | result in social choice theory |
C17607
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: result in social choice theory Context triple: [Arrow’s impossibility theorem, instanceOf, result in social choice theory]
-
A.
work in social choice theory
Work in social choice theory examines how individual preferences can be aggregated into collective decisions, analyzing the fairness, consistency, and implications of different voting and choice mechanisms.
-
B.
decision theory
Decision theory is the study of how agents should and do make rational choices under conditions of uncertainty, balancing preferences, probabilities, and outcomes.
-
C.
theory of rational choice under risk
A theory of rational choice under risk explains how individuals should make decisions among uncertain outcomes by systematically comparing the expected utilities of available options, given their probabilities and the decision-maker’s preferences.
-
D.
bargaining solution concept
A bargaining solution concept is a formal rule or principle that specifies how two or more parties should divide the benefits of cooperation given their feasible payoffs and disagreement outcomes.
-
E.
socio-economic theory
Socio-economic theory is a conceptual framework that analyzes how economic activity, social structures, and power relations interact to shape the distribution of resources, opportunities, and outcomes in society.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd4441d1648190a54a533895041987 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 12:57 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:41 p.m.