Triple

T36973078
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Thompson v. Oklahoma E914619 entity
Predicate reliesOnDoctrine P41967 FINISHED
Object evolving standards of decency LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: evolving standards of decency | Statement: [Thompson v. Oklahoma, reliesOnDoctrine, evolving standards of decency]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: reliesOnDoctrine
Context triple: [Thompson v. Oklahoma, reliesOnDoctrine, evolving standards of decency]
  • A. followsDoctrine
    Indicates that one entity adheres to, complies with, or acts in accordance with a specified doctrine or set of guiding principles.
  • B. confirmedDoctrine
    Indicates that an authority has officially validated, endorsed, or ratified a particular doctrine as true or acceptable.
  • C. isRelevantToDoctrine chosen
    Indicates that something has a meaningful connection or applicability to a particular doctrine, principle, or set of beliefs.
  • D. developedDoctrine
    Indicates that one entity created, formulated, or significantly advanced a particular doctrine or set of principles.
  • E. citedForDoctrine
    Indicates that one entity is cited as an authoritative source or precedent for a particular doctrine, principle, or rule in relation to another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76e8d13b4819089af24a47ce092fc completed May 3, 2026, 3:49 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fa0a7b00948190a257273d9968c5d7 completed May 5, 2026, 3:19 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f9fec9c9488190ae2a349651a02782 completed May 5, 2026, 2:29 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:14 p.m.