Thompson v. Oklahoma
E914619
Thompson v. Oklahoma is a 1988 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held executing offenders who were under 16 at the time of their crimes violates the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment.
All labels observed (2)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| Thompson v. Oklahoma canonical | 2 |
| Thompson v. Oklahoma, 487 U.S. 815 (1988) | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T11257159 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Thompson v. Oklahoma Context triple: [Roper v. Simmons, relatedCase, Thompson v. Oklahoma]
-
A.
Skinner v. Oklahoma
Skinner v. Oklahoma is a landmark 1942 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down a state law mandating the sterilization of certain criminal offenders, recognizing procreation as a fundamental right under the Equal Protection Clause.
-
B.
Powell v. Alabama
Powell v. Alabama is a landmark 1932 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held in capital cases the Due Process Clause requires defendants be given access to effective legal counsel, especially when they are young, illiterate, or otherwise disadvantaged.
-
C.
Strickland v. Washington
Strickland v. Washington is a landmark 1984 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the two-pronged test for determining when a criminal defendant’s right to effective assistance of counsel has been violated.
-
D.
Jurek v. Texas
Jurek v. Texas is a 1976 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld the constitutionality of Texas’s capital sentencing scheme and helped define the modern framework for death penalty procedures under the Eighth Amendment.
-
E.
Moore v. Texas
Moore v. Texas is a U.S. Supreme Court case that refined the standards for determining intellectual disability in capital cases, reinforcing constitutional limits on executing individuals with such disabilities.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Thompson v. Oklahoma Target entity description: Thompson v. Oklahoma is a 1988 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held executing offenders who were under 16 at the time of their crimes violates the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment.
-
A.
Skinner v. Oklahoma
Skinner v. Oklahoma is a landmark 1942 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down a state law mandating the sterilization of certain criminal offenders, recognizing procreation as a fundamental right under the Equal Protection Clause.
-
B.
Powell v. Alabama
Powell v. Alabama is a landmark 1932 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held in capital cases the Due Process Clause requires defendants be given access to effective legal counsel, especially when they are young, illiterate, or otherwise disadvantaged.
-
C.
Strickland v. Washington
Strickland v. Washington is a landmark 1984 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the two-pronged test for determining when a criminal defendant’s right to effective assistance of counsel has been violated.
-
D.
Jurek v. Texas
Jurek v. Texas is a 1976 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld the constitutionality of Texas’s capital sentencing scheme and helped define the modern framework for death penalty procedures under the Eighth Amendment.
-
E.
Moore v. Texas
Moore v. Texas is a U.S. Supreme Court case that refined the standards for determining intellectual disability in capital cases, reinforcing constitutional limits on executing individuals with such disabilities.
- F. None of above. chosen
Statements (49)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
Eighth Amendment case
ⓘ
United States Supreme Court case ⓘ criminal law case ⓘ |
| appliesTo | offenders under 16 years of age at the time of the offense ⓘ |
| concerns |
capital punishment
ⓘ
juvenile death penalty ⓘ juvenile offenders ⓘ |
| hasAreaOfLaw |
capital punishment law
ⓘ
constitutional law ⓘ criminal procedure ⓘ |
| hasCitation | 487 U.S. 815 ⓘ |
| hasConcurrenceBy |
Harry A. Blackmun
ⓘ
Sandra Day O’Connor ⓘ Thurgood Marshall ⓘ William J. Brennan Jr. ⓘ |
| hasConstitutionalProvisionInvolved |
Eighth Amendment
ⓘ
Fourteenth Amendment ⓘ |
| hasCountry |
United States
ⓘ
linked to:
United States of America
|
| hasCourt | Supreme Court of the United States ⓘ |
| hasDecisionDate | 1988-06-29 ⓘ |
| hasDecisionType | plurality opinion ⓘ |
| hasDissentBy |
Antonin Scalia
ⓘ
Byron R. White ⓘ Lewis F. Powell Jr. ⓘ William H. Rehnquist ⓘ |
| hasDocketNumber | 86-6169 ⓘ |
| hasEffect | set a constitutional minimum age of 16 for the death penalty at the time of decision ⓘ |
| hasHolding | executing a person for a crime committed when under 16 years old is unconstitutional ⓘ |
| hasJurisdiction | federal ⓘ |
| hasLegalIssue |
constitutionality of executing offenders who were under 16 at the time of their crimes
ⓘ
scope of the Eighth Amendment prohibition on cruel and unusual punishments ⓘ |
| hasMajorityOpinionBy | John Paul Stevens ⓘ |
| hasOutcome | death sentence vacated ⓘ |
| hasPetitioner | William Wayne Thompson ⓘ |
| hasPluralityOpinionBy | John Paul Stevens ⓘ |
| hasProceduralPosture | review of a death sentence imposed by an Oklahoma state court on a defendant who was 15 at the time of the offense ⓘ |
| hasRespondent |
State of Oklahoma
ⓘ
linked to:
U.S. state of Oklahoma
|
| hasStateParty | Oklahoma ⓘ |
| hasSubjectMatter | cruel and unusual punishment ⓘ |
| hasUSReportsPage | 815 ⓘ |
| hasUSReportsVolume | 487 ⓘ |
| hasVoteSplit | 4-1-4 ⓘ |
| hasYearDecided | 1988 ⓘ |
| holds | the Eighth Amendment prohibits execution of offenders who were under 16 years of age at the time of their offense ⓘ |
| interprets | Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution ⓘ |
| isLimitedTo | minimum age for capital punishment ⓘ |
| isRelatedCase |
Roper v. Simmons
ⓘ
Stanford v. Kentucky ⓘ
linked to:
Stanford v. Kentucky, 492 U.S. 361 (1989)
|
| reliesOnDoctrine | evolving standards of decency ⓘ |
How these facts were elicited
The pipeline generated the facts above by prompting gpt-5.1 with this entity's name + description and the instruction below.
Instruction
You are a knowledge base construction expert. Given a subject entity and a description of it, return factual statements that you know for the subject as a JSON list of dictionaries(triples), where keys must be "subject", "predicate" and "object". The number of facts may be very high, between 25 to 50 or more, for very popular subjects. For less popular subjects, the number of facts can be very low, like 5 or 10. # Requirements - If you don't know the subject at all, return an empty list. - If the subject is not a named entity, return an empty list. - Include at least one triple where predicate is "instanceOf". - Do not get too wordy. - Separate several objects into multiple triples with one object.
Input
Subject: Thompson v. Oklahoma Description of subject: Thompson v. Oklahoma is a 1988 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held executing offenders who were under 16 at the time of their crimes violates the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment.
Referenced by (3)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.
Stanford v. Kentucky, 492 U.S. 361 (1989)
→
relatedCase
→
Thompson v. Oklahoma, 487 U.S. 815 (1988)
ⓘ
linked to: Thompson v. Oklahoma