Triple

T362342
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject New Zealand Sign Language E7882 entity
Predicate hasLinguisticResearchOn P934 FINISHED
Object phonology LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: phonology | Statement: [New Zealand Sign Language, hasLinguisticResearchOn, phonology]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasLinguisticResearchOn
Context triple: [New Zealand Sign Language, hasLinguisticResearchOn, phonology]
  • A. hasLinguisticTypology
    Indicates a relationship where a language or linguistic system is characterized by a specific typological classification or structural type.
  • B. hasLanguageOfStudy
    Indicates that an entity studies or is engaged in learning a particular language.
  • C. hasLinguisticElement
    Indicates that one entity includes, is associated with, or is characterized by a particular linguistic component such as a word, phrase, symbol, or other language element.
  • D. hasResearchArea chosen
    Indicates that an entity (such as a person, project, or organization) is associated with or focused on a particular field or area of research.
  • E. hasLanguageOn
    Indicates that an entity uses or is associated with a particular language in a specific context, medium, or location.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a2e7e880008190a6ad7e06e5d03007 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:04 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a2ebcfb0f48190b9a9010c7837ac58 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:21 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a2e95c843c8190b2aba9af6e869ba1 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:10 p.m.
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:08 p.m.