Triple
T34280626
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Cummings v. Missouri |
E879579
|
entity |
| Predicate | penaltyChallenged |
P106288
|
FINISHED |
| Object | disqualification from preaching without taking loyalty oath |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: disqualification from preaching without taking loyalty oath | Statement: [Cummings v. Missouri, penaltyChallenged, disqualification from preaching without taking loyalty oath]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: penaltyChallenged Context triple: [Cummings v. Missouri, penaltyChallenged, disqualification from preaching without taking loyalty oath]
-
A.
punishmentChallenged
chosen
Indicates that an imposed punishment is being questioned, disputed, or formally contested.
-
B.
stateActionChallenged
Indicates that an action taken by a state (or state authority) has been formally disputed, questioned, or contested by another party.
-
C.
laterChallengedBy
Indicates that an earlier claim, decision, or position was subsequently questioned, disputed, or opposed by another party.
-
D.
branchChallenged
Indicates that one branch or offshoot has been questioned, disputed, or formally contested by another party or authority.
-
E.
penaltyStatus
Indicates the current state or condition of a penalty that has been assigned or is applicable in a given context.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f349b5f6648190b9420d94a4cd16e0 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:23 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f71362f1448190985a80ce7af475cb |
completed | May 3, 2026, 9:20 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f7127884388190884f23d181a65d19 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 9:16 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:57 a.m.