Triple
T3064094
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Artemis Accords |
E62062
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | non-binding political commitment |
C2011
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: non-binding political commitment Context triple: [Artemis Accords, instanceOf, non-binding political commitment]
-
A.
political agreement
A political agreement is a negotiated understanding or formal accord between political actors or entities that defines shared commitments, terms, and responsibilities on specific issues or policies.
-
B.
nuclear reservation
A nuclear reservation is a designated area of land set aside for the development, testing, production, storage, or decommissioning of nuclear materials and facilities under strict regulatory control.
-
C.
legal pledge
A legal pledge is a formal commitment, often documented and enforceable by law, in which a party promises to fulfill specific obligations or refrain from certain actions, typically as security or assurance in a legal or contractual context.
-
D.
international political declaration
chosen
An international political declaration is a formal, non-binding statement adopted by states or international bodies that articulates shared political intentions, principles, or commitments on global or regional issues.
-
E.
nationally determined contribution
A nationally determined contribution is a country's self-defined climate action plan under the Paris Agreement, outlining its targets and measures for reducing greenhouse gas emissions and adapting to climate change.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ad85793e5c8190a358049bc4a98d8c |
completed | March 8, 2026, 2:19 p.m. |
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:02 p.m.