Triple
T2744745
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Yamashita standard |
E60838
|
entity |
| Predicate | standardOfLiability |
P30149
|
FINISHED |
| Object | knew or should have known |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: knew or should have known | Statement: [Yamashita standard, standardOfLiability, knew or should have known]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: standardOfLiability Context triple: [Yamashita standard, standardOfLiability, knew or should have known]
-
A.
establishesLiabilityFor
Indicates that one party is held legally responsible or accountable for a particular act, omission, or outcome.
-
B.
legalStandardType
chosen
Indicates the specific type or category of legal standard that governs or applies to a given legal rule, decision, or evaluation.
-
C.
standardOfProof
Indicates the level or degree of certainty required to establish that a claim or allegation is true in a given context.
-
D.
standardOfReview
Indicates the level and type of scrutiny an authority (such as a court or reviewer) applies when evaluating a prior decision, action, or finding.
-
E.
legalStandardHistoricallyAssociatedWith
Indicates that a particular legal standard has been historically linked or traditionally associated with another legal concept, practice, or context.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ab4b79846081909096725374d65ce9 |
completed | March 6, 2026, 9:47 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abdb32ef74819096ae399d16d4f31d |
completed | March 7, 2026, 8 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abd829f1e88190aab1d54f87c69714 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 7:47 a.m. |
Created at: March 6, 2026, 9:56 p.m.