Triple
T23967190
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Nasdaq Listing Qualifications Department |
E604117
|
entity |
| Predicate | subjectToAppealBefore |
P17875
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Nasdaq Hearings Panel |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Nasdaq Hearings Panel | Statement: [Nasdaq Listing Qualifications Department, subjectToAppealBefore, Nasdaq Hearings Panel]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: subjectToAppealBefore Context triple: [Nasdaq Listing Qualifications Department, subjectToAppealBefore, Nasdaq Hearings Panel]
-
A.
canBeAppealedTo
chosen
Indicates that a decision, action, or authority is subject to being challenged or reviewed by a higher or alternative authority through an appeal process.
-
B.
hasAppealsTo
Indicates that one entity formally challenges or seeks review of a decision, judgment, or outcome through another entity or process.
-
C.
cannotBeAppealed
Indicates that a decision, ruling, or outcome is final and cannot be challenged or reviewed through an appeal process.
-
D.
requiresLeaveToAppeal
Indicates that a party must obtain formal permission from a higher court before proceeding with an appeal.
-
E.
appealsFrom
Indicates that a decision, judgment, or ruling is being challenged and taken to a higher authority or court for review.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e29543019c8190872462e593cc50b4 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 8:17 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f1d1d8cc2881909ac2c46030677e9f |
completed | April 29, 2026, 9:39 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f161578d54819084a8b35496299993 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 1:39 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 9:24 p.m.