Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476 (1957) | Statement: [Roth test for obscenity, usedInCase, Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476 (1957)]

Target entity: Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476 (1957)
Context triple: [Roth test for obscenity, usedInCase, Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476 (1957)]

• A. Roth v. United States chosen
  Roth v. United States is a landmark 1957 U.S. Supreme Court decision that redefined the legal standard for obscenity under the First Amendment.
• B. Reynolds v. United States
  Reynolds v. United States is an 1879 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the distinction between protected religious belief and regulable religiously motivated conduct, holding that the Free Exercise Clause does not excuse individuals from compliance with otherwise valid criminal laws such as those banning polygamy.
• C. United States v. Rabinowitz
  United States v. Rabinowitz is a 1950 U.S. Supreme Court decision that narrowed Fourth Amendment protections by upholding a warrantless search incident to a lawful arrest.
• D. Wright v. United States
  Wright v. United States is a 1938 U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified the scope of presidential veto power and the constitutional requirements for lawmaking under the Presentment Clause.
• E. Durousseau v. United States
  Durousseau v. United States is an 1810 U.S. Supreme Court decision that clarified the scope of federal judicial power by interpreting Congress’s authority to make exceptions and regulations to the Court’s appellate jurisdiction.
• F. None of above.
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.