Roth test for obscenity
E552709
The Roth test for obscenity is a legal standard established by the U.S. Supreme Court to determine whether material is obscene and therefore not protected by the First Amendment.
All labels observed (1)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| Roth test for obscenity canonical | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T5879122 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Roth test for obscenity Context triple: [opinion in Ginzburg v. United States, relatedDoctrine, Roth test for obscenity]
-
A.
Lemon test
The Lemon test is a three-pronged legal standard used by U.S. courts to determine whether a government action violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.
-
B.
"Howl" obscenity trial
The "Howl" obscenity trial was a landmark 1957 U.S. court case that tested the limits of literary free speech by challenging whether Allen Ginsberg’s poem "Howl" was legally obscene, ultimately affirming its protection under the First Amendment.
-
C.
Censura Forensis
Censura Forensis is a significant 17th-century legal treatise by Dutch jurist Simon van Leeuwen that systematically analyzes and critiques contemporary civil and canon law.
-
D.
Bethel School District No. 403 v. Fraser
Bethel School District No. 403 v. Fraser is a 1986 U.S. Supreme Court case that held public schools may discipline students for lewd or indecent speech, distinguishing such expression from the protected political speech recognized in Tinker.
-
E.
Immorality Act
The Immorality Act was a key apartheid-era South African law that criminalized sexual relations between people classified as belonging to different racial groups.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Roth test for obscenity Target entity description: The Roth test for obscenity is a legal standard established by the U.S. Supreme Court to determine whether material is obscene and therefore not protected by the First Amendment.
-
A.
Lemon test
The Lemon test is a three-pronged legal standard used by U.S. courts to determine whether a government action violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.
-
B.
"Howl" obscenity trial
The "Howl" obscenity trial was a landmark 1957 U.S. court case that tested the limits of literary free speech by challenging whether Allen Ginsberg’s poem "Howl" was legally obscene, ultimately affirming its protection under the First Amendment.
-
C.
Censura Forensis
Censura Forensis is a significant 17th-century legal treatise by Dutch jurist Simon van Leeuwen that systematically analyzes and critiques contemporary civil and canon law.
-
D.
Bethel School District No. 403 v. Fraser
Bethel School District No. 403 v. Fraser is a 1986 U.S. Supreme Court case that held public schools may discipline students for lewd or indecent speech, distinguishing such expression from the protected political speech recognized in Tinker.
-
E.
Immorality Act
The Immorality Act was a key apartheid-era South African law that criminalized sexual relations between people classified as belonging to different racial groups.
- F. None of above. chosen
Statements (30)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
legal test
ⓘ
obscenity standard ⓘ |
| appliesTo |
books
ⓘ
magazines ⓘ obscenity ⓘ other expressive materials ⓘ |
| basedOnDecision | Roth v. United States ⓘ |
| consequenceOfFindingObscene | material not protected by the First Amendment ⓘ |
| decidingCourt | Supreme Court of the United States ⓘ |
| defines | when material is legally obscene ⓘ |
| focusesOn |
whether material is utterly without redeeming social importance
ⓘ
whether the average person would find the dominant theme appeals to prurient interest ⓘ |
| historicalSignificance | first modern Supreme Court attempt to define obscenity under the First Amendment ⓘ |
| influencedBy | earlier common law obscenity doctrines ⓘ |
| jurisdiction |
United States
ⓘ
linked to:
United States of America
|
| legalArea |
freedom of speech
ⓘ
freedom of the press ⓘ |
| legalSystem | United States constitutional law ⓘ |
| partiallyOverruledBy | Miller v. California ⓘ |
| predecessorOf | Miller test for obscenity ⓘ |
| relatedConcept |
obscene material
ⓘ
prurient interest ⓘ redeeming social importance ⓘ |
| relatedToAmendment | First Amendment to the United States Constitution ⓘ |
| replacedBy | Miller test ⓘ |
| standardType | national standard ⓘ |
| status | superseded standard ⓘ |
| stillCitedFor | historical development of obscenity law in the United States ⓘ |
| usedInCase |
Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476 (1957)
ⓘ
linked to:
Roth v. United States
|
| yearEstablished | 1957 ⓘ |
How these facts were elicited
The pipeline generated the facts above by prompting gpt-5.1 with this entity's name + description and the instruction below.
Instruction
You are a knowledge base construction expert. Given a subject entity and a description of it, return factual statements that you know for the subject as a JSON list of dictionaries(triples), where keys must be "subject", "predicate" and "object". The number of facts may be very high, between 25 to 50 or more, for very popular subjects. For less popular subjects, the number of facts can be very low, like 5 or 10. # Requirements - If you don't know the subject at all, return an empty list. - If the subject is not a named entity, return an empty list. - Include at least one triple where predicate is "instanceOf". - Do not get too wordy. - Separate several objects into multiple triples with one object.
Input
Subject: Roth test for obscenity Description of subject: The Roth test for obscenity is a legal standard established by the U.S. Supreme Court to determine whether material is obscene and therefore not protected by the First Amendment.
Referenced by (1)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.