Triple
T21915874
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Child Labor Tax Law of 1919 |
E541181
|
entity |
| Predicate | challengedInCase |
P3996
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Bailey v. Drexel Furniture Co. |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (3 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Bailey v. Drexel Furniture Co. | Statement: [Child Labor Tax Law of 1919, challengedInCase, Bailey v. Drexel Furniture Co.]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Bailey v. Drexel Furniture Co. Context triple: [Child Labor Tax Law of 1919, challengedInCase, Bailey v. Drexel Furniture Co.]
-
A.
Bailey v. Patterson
Bailey v. Patterson is a 1962 U.S. Supreme Court case that addressed the constitutionality of state laws requiring racial segregation in transportation facilities.
-
B.
Hines v. Davidowitz
Hines v. Davidowitz is a 1941 U.S. Supreme Court case that held federal law preempts conflicting state alien-registration laws under the Supremacy Clause.
-
C.
Lucas v. Earl
Lucas v. Earl is a landmark 1930 U.S. Supreme Court tax law case that established the principle that income is taxed to the person who earns it, regardless of contractual arrangements to split or assign that income.
-
D.
Edwards v. Balisok
Edwards v. Balisok is a 1997 U.S. Supreme Court decision that applied the Heck v. Humphrey doctrine to prison disciplinary proceedings, limiting when inmates can seek damages under §1983 if success would imply the invalidity of disciplinary sanctions affecting the length of confinement.
-
E.
MacPherson v. Buick Motor Co.
MacPherson v. Buick Motor Co. is a landmark 1916 New York Court of Appeals case that expanded manufacturers’ liability in negligence to consumers, even without privity of contract.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Bailey v. Drexel Furniture Co. Target entity description: Bailey v. Drexel Furniture Co. was a 1922 U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court struck down a federal tax on companies using child labor, limiting Congress’s power to regulate labor conditions through its taxing authority.
-
A.
Bailey v. Patterson
Bailey v. Patterson is a 1962 U.S. Supreme Court case that addressed the constitutionality of state laws requiring racial segregation in transportation facilities.
-
B.
Hines v. Davidowitz
Hines v. Davidowitz is a 1941 U.S. Supreme Court case that held federal law preempts conflicting state alien-registration laws under the Supremacy Clause.
-
C.
Lucas v. Earl
Lucas v. Earl is a landmark 1930 U.S. Supreme Court tax law case that established the principle that income is taxed to the person who earns it, regardless of contractual arrangements to split or assign that income.
-
D.
Edwards v. Balisok
Edwards v. Balisok is a 1997 U.S. Supreme Court decision that applied the Heck v. Humphrey doctrine to prison disciplinary proceedings, limiting when inmates can seek damages under §1983 if success would imply the invalidity of disciplinary sanctions affecting the length of confinement.
-
E.
MacPherson v. Buick Motor Co.
MacPherson v. Buick Motor Co. is a landmark 1916 New York Court of Appeals case that expanded manufacturers’ liability in negligence to consumers, even without privity of contract.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0c47c4b9c8190a5586a75f5f36453 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 11:14 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f123378140819090a30453c1db7f38 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 9:14 p.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 7:42 p.m.