Bailey v. Drexel Furniture Co.
E1507711
UNEXPLORED
Bailey v. Drexel Furniture Co. was a 1922 U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court struck down a federal tax on companies using child labor, limiting Congress’s power to regulate labor conditions through its taxing authority.
All labels observed (1)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| Bailey v. Drexel Furniture Co. canonical | 2 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T21915874 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Bailey v. Drexel Furniture Co. Context triple: [Child Labor Tax Law of 1919, challengedInCase, Bailey v. Drexel Furniture Co.]
-
A.
Bailey v. Patterson
Bailey v. Patterson is a 1962 U.S. Supreme Court case that addressed the constitutionality of state laws requiring racial segregation in transportation facilities.
-
B.
Hines v. Davidowitz
Hines v. Davidowitz is a 1941 U.S. Supreme Court case that held federal law preempts conflicting state alien-registration laws under the Supremacy Clause.
-
C.
Lucas v. Earl
Lucas v. Earl is a landmark 1930 U.S. Supreme Court tax law case that established the principle that income is taxed to the person who earns it, regardless of contractual arrangements to split or assign that income.
-
D.
Edwards v. Balisok
Edwards v. Balisok is a 1997 U.S. Supreme Court decision that applied the Heck v. Humphrey doctrine to prison disciplinary proceedings, limiting when inmates can seek damages under §1983 if success would imply the invalidity of disciplinary sanctions affecting the length of confinement.
-
E.
MacPherson v. Buick Motor Co.
MacPherson v. Buick Motor Co. is a landmark 1916 New York Court of Appeals case that expanded manufacturers’ liability in negligence to consumers, even without privity of contract.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Bailey v. Drexel Furniture Co. Target entity description: Bailey v. Drexel Furniture Co. was a 1922 U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court struck down a federal tax on companies using child labor, limiting Congress’s power to regulate labor conditions through its taxing authority.
-
A.
Bailey v. Patterson
Bailey v. Patterson is a 1962 U.S. Supreme Court case that addressed the constitutionality of state laws requiring racial segregation in transportation facilities.
-
B.
Hines v. Davidowitz
Hines v. Davidowitz is a 1941 U.S. Supreme Court case that held federal law preempts conflicting state alien-registration laws under the Supremacy Clause.
-
C.
Lucas v. Earl
Lucas v. Earl is a landmark 1930 U.S. Supreme Court tax law case that established the principle that income is taxed to the person who earns it, regardless of contractual arrangements to split or assign that income.
-
D.
Edwards v. Balisok
Edwards v. Balisok is a 1997 U.S. Supreme Court decision that applied the Heck v. Humphrey doctrine to prison disciplinary proceedings, limiting when inmates can seek damages under §1983 if success would imply the invalidity of disciplinary sanctions affecting the length of confinement.
-
E.
MacPherson v. Buick Motor Co.
MacPherson v. Buick Motor Co. is a landmark 1916 New York Court of Appeals case that expanded manufacturers’ liability in negligence to consumers, even without privity of contract.
- F. None of above. chosen
Referenced by (2)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.