Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: Ziglar v. Abbasi, 582 U.S. 120 (2017) | Statement: [Bivens doctrine, subjectOf, Ziglar v. Abbasi, 582 U.S. 120 (2017)]

Target entity: Ziglar v. Abbasi, 582 U.S. 120 (2017)
Context triple: [Bivens doctrine, subjectOf, Ziglar v. Abbasi, 582 U.S. 120 (2017)]

• A. Zubik v. Burwell
  Zubik v. Burwell is a U.S. Supreme Court case concerning religious nonprofits’ objections to the Affordable Care Act’s contraceptive coverage mandate and the accommodation process for opting out.
• B. Altitude Express Inc. v. Zarda
  Altitude Express Inc. v. Zarda is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case that held federal employment discrimination law protects gay and lesbian employees from being fired because of their sexual orientation.
• C. Patchak v. Zinke
  Patchak v. Zinke is a 2018 U.S. Supreme Court case that addressed Congress’s power to strip federal courts of jurisdiction over pending lawsuits without violating the Constitution’s separation of powers.
• D. Fitzpatrick v. Bitzer
  Fitzpatrick v. Bitzer is a 1976 U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that Congress may, under its Fourteenth Amendment enforcement powers, authorize private lawsuits for money damages against state governments despite Eleventh Amendment sovereign immunity.
• E. Argersinger v. Hamlin
  Argersinger v. Hamlin is a 1972 U.S. Supreme Court case that extended the right to counsel to defendants in misdemeanor cases that may result in imprisonment.
• F. None of above. chosen
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. 
You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. 
# Instructions
Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. 
Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential.
# Response Format
Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"

Entity: Ziglar v. Abbasi, 582 U.S. 120 (2017)
Triple: [Bivens doctrine, subjectOf, Ziglar v. Abbasi, 582 U.S. 120 (2017)]

Ziglar v. Abbasi, 582 U.S. 120 (2017), is a U.S. Supreme Court decision that sharply limited the availability of implied damages actions against federal officials under the Bivens doctrine, especially in national security and immigration detention contexts.

Target entity: Ziglar v. Abbasi, 582 U.S. 120 (2017)
Target entity description: Ziglar v. Abbasi, 582 U.S. 120 (2017), is a U.S. Supreme Court decision that sharply limited the availability of implied damages actions against federal officials under the Bivens doctrine, especially in national security and immigration detention contexts.

• A. Zubik v. Burwell
  Zubik v. Burwell is a U.S. Supreme Court case concerning religious nonprofits’ objections to the Affordable Care Act’s contraceptive coverage mandate and the accommodation process for opting out.
• B. Altitude Express Inc. v. Zarda
  Altitude Express Inc. v. Zarda is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case that held federal employment discrimination law protects gay and lesbian employees from being fired because of their sexual orientation.
• C. Patchak v. Zinke
  Patchak v. Zinke is a 2018 U.S. Supreme Court case that addressed Congress’s power to strip federal courts of jurisdiction over pending lawsuits without violating the Constitution’s separation of powers.
• D. Fitzpatrick v. Bitzer
  Fitzpatrick v. Bitzer is a 1976 U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that Congress may, under its Fourteenth Amendment enforcement powers, authorize private lawsuits for money damages against state governments despite Eleventh Amendment sovereign immunity.
• E. Argersinger v. Hamlin
  Argersinger v. Hamlin is a 1972 U.S. Supreme Court case that extended the right to counsel to defendants in misdemeanor cases that may result in imprisonment.
• F. None of above. chosen