Ziglar v. Abbasi, 582 U.S. 120 (2017)
E1406817
UNEXPLORED
Ziglar v. Abbasi, 582 U.S. 120 (2017), is a U.S. Supreme Court decision that sharply limited the availability of implied damages actions against federal officials under the Bivens doctrine, especially in national security and immigration detention contexts.
All labels observed (1)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| Ziglar v. Abbasi, 582 U.S. 120 (2017) canonical | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T20023657 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Ziglar v. Abbasi, 582 U.S. 120 (2017) Context triple: [Bivens doctrine, subjectOf, Ziglar v. Abbasi, 582 U.S. 120 (2017)]
-
A.
Zubik v. Burwell
Zubik v. Burwell is a U.S. Supreme Court case concerning religious nonprofits’ objections to the Affordable Care Act’s contraceptive coverage mandate and the accommodation process for opting out.
-
B.
Altitude Express Inc. v. Zarda
Altitude Express Inc. v. Zarda is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case that held federal employment discrimination law protects gay and lesbian employees from being fired because of their sexual orientation.
-
C.
Patchak v. Zinke
Patchak v. Zinke is a 2018 U.S. Supreme Court case that addressed Congress’s power to strip federal courts of jurisdiction over pending lawsuits without violating the Constitution’s separation of powers.
-
D.
Fitzpatrick v. Bitzer
Fitzpatrick v. Bitzer is a 1976 U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that Congress may, under its Fourteenth Amendment enforcement powers, authorize private lawsuits for money damages against state governments despite Eleventh Amendment sovereign immunity.
-
E.
Argersinger v. Hamlin
Argersinger v. Hamlin is a 1972 U.S. Supreme Court case that extended the right to counsel to defendants in misdemeanor cases that may result in imprisonment.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Ziglar v. Abbasi, 582 U.S. 120 (2017) Target entity description: Ziglar v. Abbasi, 582 U.S. 120 (2017), is a U.S. Supreme Court decision that sharply limited the availability of implied damages actions against federal officials under the Bivens doctrine, especially in national security and immigration detention contexts.
-
A.
Zubik v. Burwell
Zubik v. Burwell is a U.S. Supreme Court case concerning religious nonprofits’ objections to the Affordable Care Act’s contraceptive coverage mandate and the accommodation process for opting out.
-
B.
Altitude Express Inc. v. Zarda
Altitude Express Inc. v. Zarda is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case that held federal employment discrimination law protects gay and lesbian employees from being fired because of their sexual orientation.
-
C.
Patchak v. Zinke
Patchak v. Zinke is a 2018 U.S. Supreme Court case that addressed Congress’s power to strip federal courts of jurisdiction over pending lawsuits without violating the Constitution’s separation of powers.
-
D.
Fitzpatrick v. Bitzer
Fitzpatrick v. Bitzer is a 1976 U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that Congress may, under its Fourteenth Amendment enforcement powers, authorize private lawsuits for money damages against state governments despite Eleventh Amendment sovereign immunity.
-
E.
Argersinger v. Hamlin
Argersinger v. Hamlin is a 1972 U.S. Supreme Court case that extended the right to counsel to defendants in misdemeanor cases that may result in imprisonment.
- F. None of above. chosen
Referenced by (1)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.