Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: United States v. Paramount Pictures, Inc. | Statement: [Vinson Court, notableDecision, United States v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.]

Target entity: United States v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.
Context triple: [Vinson Court, notableDecision, United States v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.]

• A. United States v. Paramount Pictures, Inc. chosen
  United States v. Paramount Pictures, Inc. was a landmark 1948 U.S. Supreme Court antitrust decision that broke up the Hollywood studio system by ending vertical integration of film production, distribution, and exhibition.
• B. United States v. Schine Chain Theatres, Inc.
  United States v. Schine Chain Theatres, Inc. was a landmark U.S. antitrust Supreme Court case addressing monopolistic practices in the movie theater industry.
• C. Petrella v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc.
  Petrella v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc. is a 2014 U.S. Supreme Court copyright case that held the equitable doctrine of laches cannot bar claims for damages brought within the Copyright Act’s three-year statute of limitations.
• D. New York Board of Motion Picture Censorship
  The New York Board of Motion Picture Censorship was an early 20th-century American organization that reviewed and regulated films for content before evolving into the National Board of Review.
• E. Lugosi v. Universal Pictures
  Lugosi v. Universal Pictures was a landmark California legal case that addressed whether a celebrity’s right of publicity could be inherited and controlled by their heirs after death.
• F. None of above.
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.