Triple
T19508080
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Walter Wheeler Cook |
E488077
|
entity |
| Predicate | notableWork |
P4
|
FINISHED |
| Object | The Logical and Legal Bases of the Conflict of Laws |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (3 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: The Logical and Legal Bases of the Conflict of Laws | Statement: [Walter Wheeler Cook, notableWork, The Logical and Legal Bases of the Conflict of Laws]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: The Logical and Legal Bases of the Conflict of Laws Context triple: [Walter Wheeler Cook, notableWork, The Logical and Legal Bases of the Conflict of Laws]
-
A.
Commentaries on the Conflict of Laws
Commentaries on the Conflict of Laws is Joseph Story’s seminal 19th-century legal treatise that systematized and profoundly influenced the development of private international law in the United States and abroad.
-
B.
Restatement (Third) of Conflict of Laws
The Restatement (Third) of Conflict of Laws is an ongoing American Law Institute project to modernize and clarify U.S. choice-of-law, jurisdiction, and judgment-recognition principles, updating and revising the framework established by the Restatement (Second) of Conflict of Laws.
-
C.
Restatement (Second) of Conflict of Laws
The Restatement (Second) of Conflict of Laws is a highly influential legal treatise that systematically sets out modern U.S. choice-of-law principles and rules for resolving disputes involving multiple jurisdictions.
-
D.
Restatement (First) of Conflict of Laws
The Restatement (First) of Conflict of Laws is an influential American Law Institute publication that systematically set out early 20th-century U.S. choice-of-law rules and principles governing disputes involving multiple jurisdictions.
-
E.
The Paradoxes of Legal Science
The Paradoxes of Legal Science is a 1928 jurisprudential treatise by U.S. Supreme Court Justice Benjamin N. Cardozo that explores the philosophical tensions and logical contradictions within legal reasoning and doctrine.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: The Logical and Legal Bases of the Conflict of Laws Target entity description: The Logical and Legal Bases of the Conflict of Laws is a foundational legal treatise in American jurisprudence that systematically analyzes the principles governing choice of law and jurisdiction in multi-state disputes.
-
A.
Commentaries on the Conflict of Laws
Commentaries on the Conflict of Laws is Joseph Story’s seminal 19th-century legal treatise that systematized and profoundly influenced the development of private international law in the United States and abroad.
-
B.
Restatement (Third) of Conflict of Laws
The Restatement (Third) of Conflict of Laws is an ongoing American Law Institute project to modernize and clarify U.S. choice-of-law, jurisdiction, and judgment-recognition principles, updating and revising the framework established by the Restatement (Second) of Conflict of Laws.
-
C.
Restatement (Second) of Conflict of Laws
The Restatement (Second) of Conflict of Laws is a highly influential legal treatise that systematically sets out modern U.S. choice-of-law principles and rules for resolving disputes involving multiple jurisdictions.
-
D.
Restatement (First) of Conflict of Laws
The Restatement (First) of Conflict of Laws is an influential American Law Institute publication that systematically set out early 20th-century U.S. choice-of-law rules and principles governing disputes involving multiple jurisdictions.
-
E.
The Paradoxes of Legal Science
The Paradoxes of Legal Science is a 1928 jurisprudential treatise by U.S. Supreme Court Justice Benjamin N. Cardozo that explores the philosophical tensions and logical contradictions within legal reasoning and doctrine.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8e8d9d1c88190b01cd78b8be49384 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 12:11 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e635130e708190bb3d70e1abbade2a |
completed | April 20, 2026, 2:15 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:40 p.m.