The Logical and Legal Bases of the Conflict of Laws
E1380065
UNEXPLORED
The Logical and Legal Bases of the Conflict of Laws is a foundational legal treatise in American jurisprudence that systematically analyzes the principles governing choice of law and jurisdiction in multi-state disputes.
All labels observed (1)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| The Logical and Legal Bases of the Conflict of Laws canonical | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T19508080 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: The Logical and Legal Bases of the Conflict of Laws Context triple: [Walter Wheeler Cook, notableWork, The Logical and Legal Bases of the Conflict of Laws]
-
A.
Commentaries on the Conflict of Laws
Commentaries on the Conflict of Laws is Joseph Story’s seminal 19th-century legal treatise that systematized and profoundly influenced the development of private international law in the United States and abroad.
-
B.
Restatement (Third) of Conflict of Laws
The Restatement (Third) of Conflict of Laws is an ongoing American Law Institute project to modernize and clarify U.S. choice-of-law, jurisdiction, and judgment-recognition principles, updating and revising the framework established by the Restatement (Second) of Conflict of Laws.
-
C.
Restatement (Second) of Conflict of Laws
The Restatement (Second) of Conflict of Laws is a highly influential legal treatise that systematically sets out modern U.S. choice-of-law principles and rules for resolving disputes involving multiple jurisdictions.
-
D.
Restatement (First) of Conflict of Laws
The Restatement (First) of Conflict of Laws is an influential American Law Institute publication that systematically set out early 20th-century U.S. choice-of-law rules and principles governing disputes involving multiple jurisdictions.
-
E.
The Paradoxes of Legal Science
The Paradoxes of Legal Science is a 1928 jurisprudential treatise by U.S. Supreme Court Justice Benjamin N. Cardozo that explores the philosophical tensions and logical contradictions within legal reasoning and doctrine.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: The Logical and Legal Bases of the Conflict of Laws Target entity description: The Logical and Legal Bases of the Conflict of Laws is a foundational legal treatise in American jurisprudence that systematically analyzes the principles governing choice of law and jurisdiction in multi-state disputes.
-
A.
Commentaries on the Conflict of Laws
Commentaries on the Conflict of Laws is Joseph Story’s seminal 19th-century legal treatise that systematized and profoundly influenced the development of private international law in the United States and abroad.
-
B.
Restatement (Third) of Conflict of Laws
The Restatement (Third) of Conflict of Laws is an ongoing American Law Institute project to modernize and clarify U.S. choice-of-law, jurisdiction, and judgment-recognition principles, updating and revising the framework established by the Restatement (Second) of Conflict of Laws.
-
C.
Restatement (Second) of Conflict of Laws
The Restatement (Second) of Conflict of Laws is a highly influential legal treatise that systematically sets out modern U.S. choice-of-law principles and rules for resolving disputes involving multiple jurisdictions.
-
D.
Restatement (First) of Conflict of Laws
The Restatement (First) of Conflict of Laws is an influential American Law Institute publication that systematically set out early 20th-century U.S. choice-of-law rules and principles governing disputes involving multiple jurisdictions.
-
E.
The Paradoxes of Legal Science
The Paradoxes of Legal Science is a 1928 jurisprudential treatise by U.S. Supreme Court Justice Benjamin N. Cardozo that explores the philosophical tensions and logical contradictions within legal reasoning and doctrine.
- F. None of above. chosen
Referenced by (1)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.